1. I see that the last social media platform that would 'have' Alex Jones, Instagram, has taken him down. The charge? Having written a column that someone commented on in a light unfavorable to the mgt. Come again? You heard it right. Jones posted an article, to which someone replied in a way that the mgt took as being 'anti-Semitic,' and so Jones was banned. Because - here comes the new wrinkle on Big Brother's hold on us - Jones is, quote, "a hate figure".
It can't be long now...
2. I see a report on another case where Child Protective Services has gone too far, and took a young family's children away from them, on flimsy charges. What is this sort of thing all about??
Some people called 'child advocates' got into the act some years ago, under false pretenses. The real agenda:
a) The NWO crowd want to stop our children from growing up under the control of their parents, who might be Christians, bringing their kids up to be good Christians, which is anathema to the satanists feeling their power these dark days;
b) who want the children to be the charges of the state, so that they can create their Big State, a la the former USSR or Red China (which is why the moves towards mandatory vaccination programs going on right now: to usurp the role of the parent; plus, to 'chip' us cattle); and
c) there is a thriving business going on, of both the federal govt making payments for each child seized (kind of like the nifty business regarding for-profit prisons,the proceeds being split with the judges), and regarding child sex trafficking.
I can feel them going down now......
3. An old familiar 'gripe':
from jamesfetzer.org: ‘Why the Jussie Smollett Case looks like a Cover-Up to protect Kamala Harris’ - Tyler S. Farley - Harris March 28
(On evidence that K Harris was a friend of both Smollett AND the Cook County prosecutor in the case, and it may have come out that she was involved in the caper, to advance her bill to outlaw lynching in this country. She is not a NBC for having had parents who were not citizens of this country at the time of her birth.)
…
Kevin J Lankford says:
The point is; birth place alone does not determine the “jurisdiction” of ones citizenship, or ones allegiance. That is national law. Clearly one born of parents with differing citizenship will have conflicted allegiance, with birth on soil foreign to both parents only a further complication of loyalty. That is the whole purpose for “Natural Born Citizen” being a requirement in our Constitution. To insure un-conflicted allegiance as best as possible, not being able to positively ensure against treason it self.
There is only one source our founders could have derived the very :term” with its clear definition, of which they were all undeniably well familiar. That is the “Law of Nations” by Emmerich de Vattell. obama was elected through a massive scam that took advantage of dumbed down masses and lying pundits claiming expertise.
Reply
Willy says:
I have no dispute re Obama….who knows where that mongrel was born. But KH was born in the US…CA, I think…
.
The Constitution directly addresses the minimum qualifications necessary to serve as President. In addition to requiring thirty-five years of age and fourteen years of residency, the Constitution limits the presidency to “a natural born Citizen.” All the sources routinely used to interpret the Constitution confirm that the phrase “natural born Citizen” has a specific meaning: namely, someone who was a U.S. citizen at birth with no need to go through a naturalization proceeding at some later time. And Congress has made equally clear from the time of the framing of the Constitution to the current day that, subject to certain residency requirements on the parents, someone born to a U.S. citizen parent generally becomes a U.S. citizen without regard to whether the birth takes place in Canada, the Canal Zone, or the continental United States.
Reply
Stan says:
You are not listening to KJL. The whole POINT of the exercise of requiring a candidate for the office of the presidency to be a ‘natural born’ citizen, rather than just a citizen, was to make sure that the occupant of that office – who would as well, then, become the Commander in Chief of the nation’s military forces (a key factor in the eyes of the constitutional Framers) – had NO DUAL OR OTHERWISE CONFLICTING LOYALTIES OR ALLEGIANCES OR INFLUENCES. Had SOLE ALLEGIANCE to the U.S. (in this case). And this is confirmed by the to-some inconvenient historical fact that Alexander Hamilton, as a delegate to the C’l Convention proceedings, made a proposal that the president need only be, quote, “born a Citizen” – and his proposal was SPECIFICALLY TURNED DOWN, in favor of the more stringent category of citizen, i.e., one born “in the country, of parents who are citizens”. The quote being from the source that KJL referred to; which was the definitive tome of the day on such nation-building matters.
And that’s why BHO wasn’t eligible, either. And when Truth and Justice are finally served in this country, all of the legislation that he signed into law, and all of the E.O.’s and P..D.’s that he issued, and all of the appointments that he made – including to the SCOTUS, and inferior courts – will go with him. Into the trash bin For it to be as though he had never been there. For, he was never there legally.
---
Truth and Justice, anyone else????????????
It is certainly time - and almost past - for both.
No comments:
Post a Comment