On Calling One By One's Rightful Name

Following on a bit from the end of my last blog:

from thecommonsenseshow.com: ‘Google Is Laughing at Grandstanding Ted Cruz’ - Dave Hodges - June 28

(Sen. Cruz in the limelight for going after a Google executive in the light of Project Veritas’s expose of another such executive indicating that the outfit is sorry that they didn’t do more to block Trump in 2016 and won’t make the same mistake in/for the 2020 elections.  Ah, yes.  Ted Cruz.  And in the context of the presidential elections.   And with the additional piece of that context now with the televised debates of the Democrat Party presidential hopefuls including the candidacy of Sen. Kamala Harris…)

..

Stan Stanfield Fri, 06/28/2019 - 23:25

Patriots - true patriots - need to understand a fundamental fact: We were taken out from under being governed by the rule of law in this country OFFICIALLY when BHO was allowed to occupy the Oval Office, with the Republican Party as the official opposition Party failing to challenge his eligibility, for his not being a 'natural born' citizen. And why did the Repubs fail to do so? That was indicated when they ran their OWN ineligible candidates for the office in 2016 - ineligible under the same requirement. Including Sen. Ted Cruz. A 'natural born citizen' is a person "born in the country, of parents who are citizens". The whole POINT of the exercise being to make sure that the occupant of that office - who would as well, then, cont'd

Stan Stanfield Fri, 06/28/2019 - 23:33

(cont'd) become the Commander in Chief of the nation's military forces; the particular concern of the constitutional Framers for putting that particular requirement in their contract - had NO DUAL OR OTHERWISE CONFLICTING LOYALTIES OR ALLEGIANCES OR INFLUENCES. Had SOLE ALLEGIANCE to the U.S. (in this case). The definition is from the definitive tome of the day on such nation-building matters, E. de Vattel's 'The Law of Nations,' of which there is ample historical evidence that the Framers were well aware. And that eligibility requirement for that particular federal office STILL STANDS, absent a constitutional amendment to the contrary. So: Ted Cruz is not eligible for that office. And neither, apparently, is Sen. Kamala Harris.

—

If I had had the inclination to comment further, I would have pointed out, to seal the deal, that Alexander Hamilton, as a delegate to the Constitutional Convention, made a proposal there that the president need only be, quote, “born a Citizen” - and his proposal was SPECIFICALLY TURNED DOWN, in favor of the more stringent category of citizen, i.e., of having been born both of the soil (jus soli, in legal parlance) and 'of the blood' - to say, of two citizen parents (jus sanguinis).  And both major political parties fo our day have known this, as indicated by the fact that they both tried, a total fo 8 times between them, between 2003 and -08 alone, to get a constitutional amendment going through Congress regarding this requirement - proposals all having this particular issue as their common denominator - and they failed each time even getting their proposals out of committee, such was the sensitivity around this issue.  So: Both major political parties of our day KNEW the truth of this matter.  So: What did they do?

It’s obvious what they did.  They colluded.  Whether in a meeting in a smoke-filled back room or not, the conversation went something along the lines of ‘We won’t say anything about your candidate on this issue if you won’t say anything about any of the candidates that we will be putting up for the office in the future.  And between us, we control the judiciary, and the mainstream media, if some, er, disruptors happen to try to screw up the deal.  So: Deal?’

And the deal was figuratively sealed with drinks all around.

Which will turn out to be hemlock, if I have anything to say about it.  And I happen to think that I will.  Because we are living in days in which

the Truth will out.

And that’s my middle name.

The one I answer to.

And the one that I will not let down.

And what name do you answer to, Citizen??

And live by???

--

P.S. From thecommonsenseshow.com ’Scotus Makes It Illegal to Ask About the Legal’ - Dave Hodges - June 30

(Hodges wades in on the outrageous SCOTUS decision to deny the Trump administration the right to ask on its 2020 census form the status of all residents in the country.  This is tantamount to a coup against the proper rule of law in the country.  The consequences are appearing…)

Stan Stanfield - July 1   

Absolutely spot-on, Dave.  Appalling stuff.  More evidence that Trump needs to declare Martial Law, and engage in a wholesale clean-out of the country.  Including the appointments of BHO to the SCOTUS (and all inferior courts), for his not having been eligible for that office, as per my Comments on a very recent article of yours.  With all of the legislation that he signed into law, and all of the E.O.s and P.D.s that he issued, and all of the appointments that he made to federal agencies and courts to go with him.  Into the trash bin.  For it to be as though he were never there.  For, he was never there legally.  And we will thus experience the consequences of our actions, in not paying proper attention to our responsibilities as citizens.