Sunday 8 December 2013

In Conclusion


from teapartycommandcenter: 'Carney jeers, sneers at study saying Obama ignored Obamacare developer' - posted Dec. 6 - Part 2
(The thread's conversation got rather further afield from the original posting)
                    
Reply by John L Sprague 14 hours ago (Dec. 7)
HUH....you been following this thread??? His Father (if it is his father) is a Kenyan. Therefore, he is not a NBC....your right,  no matter where he was born. 
  • Reply
1047053804.jpeg
Permalink Reply by RFB 13 hours ago (Sat. Dec.7)

Let's apply some common sense to the birth place issue that so many of you have your hopes hung on.
Barack Obama's mother was an American citizen from the state of Kansas. Regardless of where Barack Obama was born he inherited his mother's citizenship. There are suggested procedures to assure the child's citizenship, however in Obama's case it would be considered to be a mere technicality.
  • Reply 
flagUS175.jpg
Permalink Reply by Stan Stanfield 1 second ago (now just into Dec. 8)

What's your problem, RFB, that you - and so many other reasonably intelligent people - don't understand that it's not an issue of his being merely a 'citizen' or not??  (Although there is actually a problem with that with him, inasmuch as his mother wasn't sufficiently of age at the time of his birth to convey her citizenship to him automatically; another matter.)  The president of the U.S. needs to be a certain KIND of citizen.  That office - and that office ONLY, of all of the federal offices - requires the candidate to be a 'natural born' citizen.  What's the difference?  A natural born citizen is one who is born on the soil (jus soli, in the legal lexicon) of TWO U.S. CITIZEN PARENTS (jus sanguinis).  The whole POINT of the exercise was to make sure that any candidate for the office of the president - WHO WOULD ALSO BECOME THE COMMANDER IN CHIEF OF THE NATION'S MILITARY FORCES - did not have any DUAL LOYALTIES OR  ALLEGIANCES - as a DUAL CITIZEN would have.  Obama was therefore ineligible for that office from the get-go.
And the clincher for believing that just being a 'citizen' is not sufficient for a person to qualify for the presidential office (as I say: for that federal office ONLY, because it's particularly SPECIAL, as noted above) is that Alexander Hamilton made a recommendation to the Constitutional Convention that such a candidate needed to be merely a 'citizen' - and his suggestion was TURNED DOWN by the delegates crafting the Constitution.  And that crucial requirement has NEVER BEEN AMENDED.  Although that procedure has been proposed a number of times - BY BOTH MAJOR POLITICAL PARTIES - but a constitutional amendment to that effect [attempted eight times between 2003 and 2008] has never made it out of the House committee responsible for such measures.  Presumably because it was deemed too politically difficult to get such an amendment all the way through the amending process.  So, what must have happened, that the Republican Party honchos didn't make an issue of it in the 2008 election primary campaigns, and then in the national campaign itself, was that they secretly struck a quid pro quo deal with their Democrat Party counterparts: We won't say anything about your candidate if you won't say anything about ours in the future.  Perhaps they were looking specifically down the road to either Marco Rubio or Ted Cruz.  Who knows.  All I know is that Tea Party types need to get VERY CLEAR about this matter.  Or you will be as guilty of trashing the Constitution as the Democrats are.  
P.S. Some Obots have tried to argue that the term 'natural born' citizen only eliminates from contention for the presidential office NATURALIZED citizens.  Which is to ignore the WHOLE POINT of the exercise.  Which was, as I say, to make sure that the person holding that office, who would be as well the Commander in Chief of the nation's military forces, DID NOT HAVE DUAL LOYALTIES OR ALLEGIANCES; as a DUAL CITIZEN would have.  
I don't care what your link says, RFB.  If it doesn't take this crucial factor into account and consideration, it is WRONG.  And speaking of links: Anyone wanting a definitive reading on this matter can go to puzo1.blogspot.com for an in-depth treatment of the matter.  Which is, at its core, PLAIN COMMON SENSE.  You are not applying your own recommendation to the matter, RFB.  
Patriots need to unite behind this reading of the matter ASAP. We have better work to do, than argue amongst ourselves over this issue.  We have a country to take back, from very dedicated usurpers - statists, who want to take down the federal constitutional republic, and make of it merely a part of a region of their New World Order.  Let's get our priorities straight.  And get'er DONE.                       
  • Reply 
--

I should perhaps have used, in my post immediately above, the word 'uniquely' special to describe the presidential office; to help convey with even more clarity my point about why the constitutional Framers set it apart from all the other federal offices that they were creating, in terms of the eligibility requirements for a candidate for it.  But I trust that my point was made clearly enough.

And how therefore he should not, must not be subjected to the impeachment process; which is for legitimately sitting presidents.

He has committed a crime by usurping the highest office in the land, yes.  But he compounded his crime - and thus opened himself to 'normal' criminal procedures, for having committed a felony - by allowing to be posted on the official White House website a copy of a document, purporting to be of his original long-form, vault-copy birth certificate, that's been analyzed by numerous experts - including my six-year-old nephew, who is an expert in plain common sense - to be fraudulent; phony; a forgery, and not even a very good one at that.     

The mind boggles.  Are these people SO arrogantly sure of themselves that they are engaging in such insolent behavior on purpose - rubbing the public's noses in their crime, because they know that their official opposition, the Republican Party, will help cover for them?  Because they got together and did a quid pro quo deal, that allowed Obama not to be questioned on his eligibility over this matter, of his birth status??  Surely not.  American political parties wouldn't do such dastardly deeds, would they??  Among other dirty tricks???...

That they are notorious for.  Although never to this extent.  This audacious, outrageous, nefarious extent.  Enough to get them jailed for the crime.
  
For crime it is.  This is not 'business as usual', politicos at the same old stand; just an example of 'dirty tricks,' writ a bit larger than usual, is all.  The people responsible for this are going down for it.  If you were in that loop: start making your plans for a long stay away from your regular haunts.  To the extent of the law on this particular issue, if I have anything to do with it.  For you have 'trifled' seriously with MY country.  And I won't stand for it.  

And all other Americans, who take exceeding umbrage at the American flag being trampled on so, will be right with me.  For this is a a crime against the nation, that any true American would not stand for, either.  

That its enactment has been part of a larger picture, helping to activate and usher in a New Era for humanity - for all of Humanity - that will see all sorts of barriers between peoples come down, including, ultimately, that of nation-states themselves, does not detract from the criminal aspect of it.  The people behind the intended takedown of the American Republic may have thought, in their minds, that they were doing an ultimately good thing (the end justifying the means, and all; to tyrannical-minded individuals).  But in their hearts they knew they were committing a major, out-and-out crime - and a particularly heinous one at that, for being against Man's free will, as it was leading to, in the construction of a totalitarian state, ruling the world like the giant monster that it was destined to become, from such roots in Coercion and power for power's sake.  So, they may have had an inkling of the right sort of outcome - a world at peace and in joyful harmony with its constituents, and all that; but they chose the wrong sort of process to get there.

They chose Force.  When the Way to get there - the only Way that one can get there, permanently (i.e., not generating a reaction, as part of the normal dialectical/unfolding process) - is by way of Love.  For Love trumps Force; and its crowning of the planet's long-unfolding political process signals the end of The Game.     

That signal - that final throw of the dice, play of the cards - is coming up.  Just as soon as our lower natures get out of the way. And allow it through.


And now, a brief, summary word about the game-completing process; before I conclude on a higher note.  

--

        
I would like to enlarge on a theme that I referred to in my last 'regular' blog,1 of, in a phrase, common cause: the Left and the Right united; to move the country neither to the Left nor to the Right.  But Up.  An energetic notch, to our next level of spiritual development.  From the lower, training-wheels grade that we have been involved in for long enough, now - a realm (not a dimension, really; more of a matrix; an illusion) for the operation of free will; to say, of duality; polarity; and seeming separation. 

Just as the majority of the people on the 'right' of the two-party-system political process don't believe in or support fascism - to say, an unholy alliance between the corporate world (bankers, industrialists; the 'movers and shakers' of society) and the government  - so the majority of the people on the 'left'  of said system don't believe in or support socialist version of the same sort of thing, when the people are in servile dependency on the state for their very sustenance - 'and don't you ever forget it, you subjects'.  Subject to a herding.  With or without their consent.  

I can only conclude -
as I feel that any reasonable person
(i.e., a person operating with reason; not with primary allegiance to or dependency on any particular  political loyalty)
can only conclude, based on the evidence -
the voluminous evidence by now -
that 'the big O' means to be such a sheepherder.  Or, more accurately: cattle rustler. The Chief cattle rustier.  El Jefe.

Consider. 

- He has caused his DHS - that's Department of Homeland Security; not Department of Health Services.  l'll get to them in a moment -  to purchase and stockpile enough ammo 'to sink a ship'.  In this case, the American ship of state.2  
     Why do I say/conclude that intended outcome, rather than its being simply for legitimate emergency reasons, like a natural disaster (HAARP, anyone??), and therefore for legitimate, peacekeeping purposes, helping the citizenry protect their property, and so forth???  Because of the larger picture that it is involved in making up; as I will be detailing here.  In this modern-day Declaration of Independence.  From the excesses of our day's King George III.3

- He has caused there to be a diluting of the legitimate vote in the country by a) having his minions employ 'vote-stuffing' techniques brought to a near-science by the likes of Saul Alinsky, said army  identified euphemistically as 'community organizers;' and b) having his Attorney General deploy his DOJ minions in going around the country trying to stop states from establishing better voter ID regulations.  

- He has erected a 'health care' national system that has more to do with people control than with health care itself, with such measures built into it as the now-federalized doctors required to ask such questions of their patients as whether or not they have weapons at home, and if so, what amount and what kind.4   
  
- He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harass our people, and eat out their substance.  -

Oh.  That's from the original Declaration of Independence.  My pen must have slipped.  But how interesting, the similarities…

and other such accusations, all evincing a similar desire: to put a people under subjugation and into bondage.  Even down to monitoring our credit card transactions, would you believe...and so on.  You get the drift.    

The drift into totalitarianism that the country has entered into.  Having been cut adrift from its founding principles, as exemplified in the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution.

Which one wonders if such principles was ever taught to schoolchildren in Hawaii…

'But The Man was a professor of Constitutional Law,' you say??; adding somewhat scornfully, 'Of course he knows the Constitution, and constitutional law.'

To which may I be permitted to reply: Not so's one would have had much of, if any, an occasion to have noticed.    

---

footnotes:

1) before the intervention of the incarnate angel, Jackie Evancho, in the 'note' of my rather sour mood of late; not liking what I am reading, and feeling, about life in these United States, one bit.
     I know that all of this has to happen; this wrapping-up stuff, of the activities of those totalitarian-minded statists amongst us, who want to enthrone 'equality' over 'liberty,' with some inevitably more equal than others, as 'friends of the state'.  But still, it's hard to take, when you're caught in the middle of it.  'It': the planned takedown of the American Republic.
     MY country.  But to continue.
       

2) He could have done that in order to keep it from the public, to say the American citizenry at large, more than for the 'peacekeepers' to use it themselves; but either way the end result is the same: that it spells Danger.  Along with the likes of 2,700 domestic-use armored personnel carriers.   And an increasing number of Drones over America.  And automobile- and people-location technology.  And…  
     And notice that El Jefe is now causing ammo manufacturers to shut down.  Under environmental considerations, of course.  You know - all that lead ending up in the environment.  From hunters shooting those pesky varmints in today's environment.  Called patriots.  


3) You know:  There was King George the First, aspiring to his even publicly announced New World Order.  And when that announcement caught too much flak, there was his son, King George the Second, under whom came the 'terrorist' assault on the American homeland, occasioning the PATRIOT Act (aren't they half-clever, though.  In a half-vast way) and the unmistakable declaration of said homeland as a 'war zone,' subject to governing operations over war zones, not peaceful times.  And now, carrying the momentum forward its steps further towards the vaunted New World Order of the Controllers - the erstwhile Controllers -  there is King George the Third: our very own El Jefe.  Coming into his own, step by stealthy Fabian step, as a full-fledged dictator.  
     And we are supposed to believe that 'there's nothing to see here, folks; keep moving right along'??  If you believe that, boy, do I have a nice waterfront property to sell you, in the Mojave Desert.
     No.  There is plenty to see here. And together, it all spells D - A - N - G - E - R.
     But, moving right along…


4) I wonder if the question is worded the exact same way as the question on the same subject asked of schoolchildren as personal info-gathering part of their new, national Common Core curriculum??  You think??? 


---

And now, for the upbeat note that I promised this sordid litany, of Man's seeming separation from Himself, would end on.

In a nutshell (the use of which metaphor my detractors will take advantage of; simple-minded as they are): All is very, very well.

We just have to get to it.

By the right road. 

To say: the correct road.

Which may or may not be the so-called, politically 'right' road.

Or a combination of them both.

In a Synthesis stage of the whole operation that we have been engaged in.

The operation, of 3D 'life' on planet Earth.  In its provided 'world of action' - of duality, and polarity, and seeming separation.*

For a purpose.

The purpose of Eduction.  For its larger purpose.

Of spiritual Advancement.

Of souls.  (Fractals, more specifically.)

Returning to their Source.

The better - more advanced - for The Experience.

And therefore

the Prime Creator being more advanced for The Experience as well.

The Experience of its constituent parts.

Being holograms of The Whole.

For

I am God.  You are God.  We are One.


And thus do I rest my case.

For now…


--

footnote:

* There is no 'evil' in the realms of true reality.  Only in the matrix - the illusion; the perceived reality - provided for such exercises/lessons.  For growth to occur; getting us ultimately on the right Path, to everlasting Life.
     Oops - getting a little ahead of myself.  To continue.  To complete, in the main body of this  brief dissertation on Things of Utmost Importance:

---

No comments: