Thursday 5 December 2013

More Of The Same...

…Only A Little Further Along

Still not able to concentrate on the positive, with all the crap on my shoes that keep me grounded, as we otherwise prepare for liftoff, in a grand Planetary Awakening of the Ages…somewhere not too far off in the near distance……I keep hearing.  And feeling within myself………just a little further……..
     In the meantime………


1) from teaparty.org: 'Rise Of Uber-Presidency' Draws Impeachment Talk- Dec. 4 - posted Dec. 5
('Congressman: Founding Fathers 'intended for Congress to have certain powers'')


Stan Stanfield · Top Commenter · Stanford University  [Dec. 5]

The man in the presidential office is illegally occupying it.  He is not a 'natural born citizen,' according to the common-sense and also American common-law definition of that term as used and intended by the constitutional Framers: a U.S. citizen who has NO DUAL LOYALTIES OR ALLEGIANCES - i.e. to say, is not a DUAL CITIZEN of any other nation.  (And ESPECIALLY NOT of England, with whom we fought a War of Independence; so this man's occupancy of that office is doubly a slap in the face.)  So, since he is not legally occupying that office, we who live by the rule of law, with the  Constitution being the law of the land, do not have to wait on an impeachment process - and should not anyway, since it gives the impression that he is a legitimate sitting president, just facing some 'high Crimes and Misdemeanor' charges relating to his legitimate presidency.  All we need to do is call on the nation's military to remove the Usurper from the position of, as well, their Commander in Chief, to be held in custody (or non-White House arrest) while awaiting his trial on various charges. Their duty - sworn by oath - is to the Constitution; not to the person in the office, illegally OR legally.

And let the chips fall where they may.  For we are talking about Truth against Falsity.  And Truth trumps Falsity.  Except in a corrupt situation.  As we have been living in in this country long enough.  It's time to get back in alignment with Truth.

And speaking of: The document that this Usurper posted on the official White House website, purportedly being a copy of his original birth certificate, has been proven to be a forgery (and apparently a not very good one at that; thus adding insult to injury).  So he is guilty of a felony right there.  There is plenty to charge him with.  We need to do it.  Before he, and his collectivist cronies, realize that the time of being called more widely on his illegality is very near, and decide that he has to speed up his plans, and create an excuse to declare Martial Law, and try to take the country over by force of arms.  

Which is why he has been culling officers whom he can't trust in such an event.  And needs to be called on that issue as well.  Before, ladies and gentlemen, it's too late; and the American flag is trampled on the ground from forces within the nation.  Not from without.

Patriots, both within and without the military services: Your response is awaited.  But: tempus fugit. 

..

Bill Johnson · Top Commenter

since the house has no guts the only way to get rid of POTUS is the Military and the constitution gives them the authority to remove any and all that do not follow the constitution

Reply · 14 · Unlike · Follow Post · 4 hours ago (Dec. 5)


  • 273350_100004489985213_1970179059_q.jpg



  • Michael Hinsley
    · Coahoma High School
  • that could get very ugly

  • Reply · 2 · Like · 4 hours ago


    Carole Mitchell Lewis
    · Top Commen
  • Maybe some of our Generals and Admirals should get together and take control. Congress doesn't have the guts to do anything. They are either on the take or they are scared to death of him. Because of that, they will never even try to impeach him. The Rep excuse. The Dems in the senate would never vote for impeachment. How do they know that if they don't try. Since they aren't going to do anything the only other option is the military. Maybe that's another reason Obama wants to get rid of our military.
  •   Reply · 3 · Unlike · 3 hours ago



  • Donald Lindsey · Top Commenter · LT at The American Citadel Guard
  • We need the military here not oversea being shot by Obama's muslim brothers

  • Reply · 3 · Like · 3 hours ago


    Stan Stanfield · Top Commenter · Stanford University
  •             Michael Hinsley: Whatever it takes.

  •              Reply · Like · 2 seconds ago







The problem with the public is while we want Obama gone we're like the frog in the pan of lukewarm water on the stove. We'll sit around until the heat gets beyond unbearable and then it'll be too late. We need a military coup to deal with the usurper in the WH.

Reply · 8 · Like · Follow Post · 3 hours ago (Dec. 5)


  • 276212_100004085058600_1135459113_q.jpg




  • Stan Stanfield
    · Top Commenter · Stanford University

  •             Jim: It doesn't have to be a coup in the sense of an overthrow. The Obama camp have been involved in the overthrow. We Americans would just be taking our country - our federal constitutional Republic - back from the Usurper and his minions.

  • Reply · Like · 2 seconds ago
                    
---

2) from godfather politics..com: 'Will Holder Sue Mississippi Over Voter ID Law?' - Dave Jolly - Dec. 4
("A number of states passed voter ID laws prior to the 2012 elections only to have US Attorney General Eric Holder file lawsuits to prevent them from taking effect.  He claimed that the voter ID laws discriminated against blacks which made no sense whatsoever.  Poor whites, Asians and Hispanics face the same daily issues as poor blacks, but Holder somehow believed that the poor blacks were less capable of obtaining a voter ID than other ethnic groups.  Talk about being discriminatory!  Blacks should be outraged at his allegations that they are less capable than others.
I truly believe that the real reason is that Holder wanted to make sure that widespread voter fraud would help re-elect Barack Obama and many other Democrats.  Unfortunately, we saw numerous examples of voter fraud from people voting multiple times, dead people voting, non-citizens voting and voting machines that registered votes for Obama when the voter selected Romney.
Prior to this year, states needed federal approval to change their voter laws and neither Obama nor Holder would allow such approval to be given.  However, the US Supreme Court struck down parts of the federal voter laws and now states no longer need federal approval to enact voter ID laws.
In 2011, the citizens of Mississippi voted to approve a constitutional amendment that requires all voters to have a valid voter ID card which could be a driver’s license or a government issued photo ID.  In 2012, Mississippi Secretary of State Delbert Hosemann tried to enforce the new amendment by issuing free government photo ID cards, but Holder blocked the effort.
Now that they no longer need federal approval, Hosemann says that they will start issuing the free government photo ID cards in early 2014.  A valid voter ID will be required for the June 2014 primary elections for US Representative and Senate.
Many are applauding the move to require the voter ID cards to help make sure the elections are fair and valid.  Their only concern is that the state is able to verify the applicants’ eligibility to vote in Mississippi… 

"I hope that the other states that enacted voter ID laws once again enforce them since they no longer need federal approval.  Those states that were afraid to enact voter ID laws because of Holder’s reign of unethical lawsuits, should now take action to pass similar laws in their own states.
My one remaining concern is that many states only require a driver’s license to register to vote or to show up at the polls to vote.  In many states like California, illegals are now being allowed to obtain a valid driver’s license.  Millions of others that are here in the US on legal visas can also obtain a valid state driver’s license.  All states should start taking measures to indicate on a person’s driver’s license if they are a US citizen.  The same needs to be done for the free state issued voter ID cards.  Photo IDs may help many liberals from voting multiple times; it won’t stop those that are not legally allowed to vote.
It’s a step in the right direction, but more needs to be done to keep Obama’s 11 million illegals and 4 million convicted felons from voting in future elections!")


pduffy a day ago (Dec. 4)
The voting booth is just an empty stall used by the elite to keep the sheeple from revolting.
"It is not he who casts the vote that has the power, but he who counts the votes" (Joseph Stalin). The same people are still counting the votes, don't care if you have an ID. When you press that little button on the screen, you have no clue that it was actually counted because your vote is untraceable. It's on a hard disk, and easily hacked by those that own the voting machines - the government you so dearly love, will never be threatened by the lowly sheeple, they have made sure of that. They are totally insulated from the threat of the voting booth.

3
Reply


  • avatar.php.png


  • kibitzer3 pduffy 12 minutes ago [Dec. 5]

  • Which is why they need to go, and we go back to paper ballots, with a clear paper trail in case of close votes.

  • As for the votes themselves: Patriots in every state need to mount a major campaign to 'true the vote' in their state before the 2014 elections; or we will NEVER be able to trust the vote in this nation again. Nothing is more important in a democratic form of government (including a republic; meaning a government of, by and for the people) than that the individual's vote can be considered sacrosanct, and not canceled out by fraudulent voting practices. Come on, people. All hands on deck, in your state, and help those who are already trying to mount such a campaign.
  • --
  • If we are even going to get that far...
  • …before one of two things happen.  Either we go further into the Dark.
  • Or we go into the Light.
  • And don't need any training wheels any longer.
---

3 comments:

smrstrauss said...

Every child born on US soil except for the children of foreign diplomats is a Natural Born US Citizen. The only kind of a US citizen who is NOT a Natural Born Citizen is a naturalized citizen.


“Natural born citizen. Persons who are born within the jurisdiction of a national government, i.e. in its territorial limits, or those born of citizens temporarily residing abroad.” — Black’s Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition

“What is a natural born citizen? Clearly, someone born within the United States or one of its territories is a natural born citizen.” (Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on OCTOBER 5, 2004)--Senator Orrin G. Hatch (R-UT).


“Under the longstanding English common-law principle of jus soli, persons born within the territory of the sovereign (other than children of enemy aliens or foreign diplomats) are citizens from birth. Thus, those persons born within the United States are "natural born citizens" and eligible to be President. Much less certain, however, is whether children born abroad of United States citizens are "natural born citizens" eligible to serve as President ..."---- Edwin Meese, et al, THE HERITAGE GUIDE TO THE CONSTITUTION (2005) [Edwin Meese was Ronald Reagan’s attorney general, and the Heritage Foundation is a well-known Conservative organization.

smrstrauss said...

Re: "And speaking of: The document that this Usurper posted on the official White House website, purportedly being a copy of his original birth certificate, has been proven to be a forgery (and apparently a not very good one at that; thus adding insult to injury)"

Only birthers claim that Obama's birth certificate is forged, and they do so repeatedly, which is all part of their LIES. (They lied about what Obama's Kenyan grandmother said. She never said that he was born in Kenya. She said that he was born in Hawaii, only birthers simply did not quote her and cut off the tape recording on their sites just before she was asked "where was he born?"----I wonder why they did that????)

So they are lying in their claim that Obama's birth certificate is forged too.

Only birther “experts” have called Obama’s birth certificate forged, and they have not shown that they are even experts, much less fair and impartial. Those are two reasons why they are not believed by Ann Coulter, Glenn Beck or the National Review (or by Mitt Romney or Paul Ryan or Gingrich or Santorum or Huckabee).

One proof that Obama’s birth certificate is not forged is Obama’s short-form birth certificate.

Short-form birth certificates are created by a clerk reading the information from the document in the file, and filling out the computer form that generates the printed short-form birth certificate. The officials in Hawaii have confirmed that they sent a short-form to Obama. So, unless they are lying—and they were Republican officials–the only way that Obama’s birth certificate could have been forged was that it was forged in 2007 and slipped into the file just before the clerk looked at the file. That is not very likely, is it? And it is especially unlikely since at the time Obama was not even the candidate of the Democrats. He was still in the primaries at the time, and he was only a junior senator from Illinois.

And birther sites have not shown you these real experts.

Dr. Neil Krawetz, an imaging software analysis author and experienced examiner of questioned images, said:“The PDF released by the White House shows no sign of digital manipulation or alterations. I see nothing that appears to be suspicious.”

Nathan Goulding with The National Review: “We have received several e-mails today calling into question the validity of the PDF that the White House released, namely that there are embedded layers in the document. There are now several other people on the case. We looked into it and dismissed it.… I’ve confirmed that scanning an image, converting it to a PDF, optimizing that PDF, and then opening it up in Illustrator, does in fact create layers similar to what is seen in the birth certificate PDF. You can try it yourself at home.”

John Woodman, independent computer professional, who is a member of the Tea Party (who says that he hates Obama’s policies but found no evidence of forgery) said repeatedly in his book and in various articles on his Web site that the claims that Obama’s birth certificate was forged were unfounded.

Ivan Zatkovich, who has testified in court as a technology expert, and consultant to WorldNetDaily:“All of the modifications to the PDF document that can be identified are consistent with someone enhancing the legibility of the document.” And, by the way, when WND received Zatkovich’s article that said that he found nothing wrong with Obama’s birth certificate, WordNDaily simply did not publish it.

Jean-Claude Tremblay, a leading software trainer and Adobe-certified expert, who has years of experience working with and teaching Adobe Illustrator, said the layers cited by doubters are evidence of the use of common, off-the-shelf scanning software — not evidence of a forgery.“I have seen a lot of illustrator documents that come from photos and contain those kind of clippings—and it looks exactly like this,” he said.

smrstrauss said...

Continuing:

Birthers’ claim that Obama’s birth certificate is false is well understood to be caused by their own motives—they hate Obama and would like to harm him.

And it is irrational (to say the very least) to think that Obama’s relatives had enough money (Obama’s grandfather was just a furniture salesman and his grandmother a low-level employee in a bank at the time; and his father came to Hawaii on a free flight) or crazy enough to spend LOTS of money on a long and expensive and risky (incidents of stillbirths were high at the time) overseas trip for their pregnant daughter—–when there were perfectly good hospitals in Honolulu, Hawaii.

Also, the government of Kenya has said that it investigated the “born in Kenya” claim, and that it did not happen.