Saturday 28 June 2014

Impeachment - Yea Or Nay


(I had prepared this to post on Thurs. evening, but my connection with the Internet was down.  I am just now catching up, with my emails, and my blogs.)


Date: June 26

To: Douglas Ramsey, Project Director, USIU

From: 'Stan' Stanfield, Concerned Citizen, USA

Re: Confidential And Secure Memorandum Of Record On The Impeachment And Removal From Office Of Barack Obama


Dear Doug,

Under your 'hat' as Project Director of the IOC [Impeach Obama Campaign] I have just told you that Obama is a Usurper, to say is not a legally sitting president - for not being a "natural born citizen," as required by the Constitution - and so he cannot by rights be impeached, which is redress for "high crimes and misdemeanors" committed while in that office by a legally sitting president.  

He must, rather and simply, be arrested, and held for trial in a (fair and impartial) court of law.*  Support that, and I will support you.

[signed]

P.S. Arrested, by Oathkeepers, active and retired; with the support of an informed citizenry. Without which, a constitutional republic cannot long endure.


* with the emphasis on the "law".  For, either we live by the rule of law or we don't; and con artists like Obama will continue to find chinks in our armor.

--

Says it all, really.  Except for the details of the definition of a NBC, as in the minds and intent of the constitutional Framers.  My reading of which is supported by various facts on the ground at the time (the private memo to G. Washington, as Chair of the Convention, by John Jay - who, not so incidentally, became the first Chief Justice of the new nation, and was one of the trio of statesmen who wrote the definitive 'Constitution-explaining Federalist Papers' ; the specific rejection of the Convention delegates of the proposal by A. Hamilton that the President need only be a 'citizen;'  the familiarity of the delegates - and especially their elder mentor on such things, B. Franklin - with E. de Vattel's 'The Law of Nations,' which propounded the legalistic aspects of such matters; the quote by George Mason that the colonists were going by American common-law, not English common law,which refers to a sovereign and therefore 'subjects'); by the position of a number of legal scholars in our time, esp. Mario Apuzzo (puzo1.blogspot.com) and the two videos on the Internet by Prof. Herb Titus; and, perhaps most telling of all: by common sense:

the Framers did not want any citizen occupying that office - and that particular federal office ONLY, let it be noted; signaling its unique importance to them (which can be accounted for, at the very least in part, but in particular part, by the fact that the candidate, if elected, as well becomes the Commander in Chief of the nation's military forces) - who had, or might have, DUAL/CONFLICTING LOYALTIES OR ALLEGIANCES. 

Like a naturalized citizen.  Or like a dual citizen.

Like one Barack Hussein Obama.

And boy, are we learning that lesson now; in the significance of a candidate who indeed had, and has proven to have, dual/conflicting loyalties or allegiances to the Constitution and the United States of America.

All 57 of them; according to the Usurper.  The Imposter.  The Great Pretender.   The would-be, law-unto-himself Dictator.

And whom, in our getting rid of, should help us learn another lesson: that being not to take the sneaky, sinister, sophistic words of slimy legalistic types who try to get the populace to believe the canard that 'original intent' is not the only legitimate way to read the Constitution; that it is a 'living document,' and means only what a majority of members of the SCOTUS say it means at any given time, in taking their cue from various political winds of the day.

Humpty Dumpty said the same thing (that "words mean what I say they mean").  And look at what happened to him.

Remember?

He had a great fall.

Lawyers and judges, past, present, and future:

Please take note.

Especially you 'activist judges' in this era of socialistic political thinking, regarding such as 'group rights' instead of individual rights.  We Patriots of the federal constitutional Republic of the United States of America - which is still standing; if but barely, under the sustained, step-by-stealthy step attack of the erstwhile dictator Obama and his Marxist minions - may run you out of town on a rail.

Only metaphorically, of course.   

For we are a peaceful people.1

Unless attacked.

And then, look out. 

And we are, indeed, under attack, now.  Particularly from within.2

And are in our awakening period. 

Fair warning.

---

footnotes:


1 Aside from the 'War Is A Racket' aberration of the fascist/'corporatist' types amongst us; and more specifically, the likes of the attempts by the NeoCons to get the U.S. to go dragon-slaying in the Middle East, just not the dragon of the state of Israel.  Which needs to apologize to the American people for a number of attacks on this nation.  Coming to mind: the Lavon Affair; the strafing and attempted sinking of the U.S.S. Liberty; its sins of omission in the suicide bombing of the U.S. Marine Barracks in Lebanon; and its sins of both omission and commission in the audacious atrocity of the "new Pearl Harbor" of 9/11.  
     There's plenty of fault, and guilt, to go around, in the cleansing and general setting-to-rights that will take place.  Before we can move Up, and out of this cesspool that we have created, or allowed to be created, in our midst. 
     Patriots: Man your stations.  We have a considerable work to do.
     Which we chose to get involved in.  Or we wouldn't be here, at this peak time, in our history on this lovely planet.
     This time of Transformation.  Aka Ascension.
     To a better place.
     Including in us.


2 Consider just this; from the Abel Danger guys (on 6/15/14):

"Puppet Regime

"It doesn’t seem lawful that the Congress could transfer regulatory authority to an organization – the North American Electric Reliability Corporation that is comprised of utility company associations, utility companies and stakeholder interests that includes both Canadian and Mexican counterparts. Even if they retained the authority of FERC over the American utility companies and Regional Transmission Operators, the tangible and intangible elements of political and economic – and the real power of control of the electric grid makes the retention of authority by FERC kind of a bad joke. But the control of our electric grid is not the only example of the Congress handing over U.S. sovereignty to international organizations. And the authority that has been handed off is being used to wage non‐ military war against us. For example, on June 4, 2014, a local television station did a story about the EPA’s proposed changes to the H20 Act and how it is going to have a negative effect on farmers.  (emphasis mine)


"Excerpts:

'The agency is trying to nix the word "navigable" from the original act, which would in turn allow the EPA to have total jurisdiction over every single water source, down to every puddle and ditch on farmers' private lands.  (emphasis mine)

'As the act currently stands, the EPA only has control over "navigable" resources, which means any large body of water you can navigate upon using a boat, such as the Snake River or even the various reservoirs across the state.

'According to Idaho Farm Bureau's John Thompson, this effort by the EPA is because it hopes to try and make sure sediment and rocks do not end up polluting these navigab
le water resources as it flows‐in from these smaller ditches and puddles from local farmlands.'
"Idaho became the 43rd state in 1890. Agriculture has always been a significant part of Idaho’s economy. We have canals running through the state to irrigate the farmland. For 124 years, we’ve managed to muddle through without the EPA and without fouling the water for our downstream neighbors – Oregon and Washington. So why is the EPA now trying to take over our water sources?

"I think you find the answer to that question in the first paragraph – the progressive waging of non‐ military war against us. The EPA is a lot like FERC in terms of being a fraud as a domestic agency of the American government. They are implementing international environmental law behind the mask of a domestic agency and it has always been that way by design of the agency since it was created…"  (emphases mine)


The environmentalists are rightly regarded as eco-fascists: As per Agenda 21, they want Man controlled to within an inch of his life; with or without legitimate regard to 'the environment'.  They are People Controllers, pure and simple.  Or at the least, fronts for those sinister powers.

It's war, alright.  War on the basic, spiritual principle of free will - the Way of our Creator -  versus Power Over Others; the way of lesser beings.

Make your choice.  It's that time.


Or it will be made for you.

No comments: