Friday 8 November 2013

Who Guards The Guards??


As much as I keep trying to concentrate on manifesting The New, and leave The Old behind, I keep being drawn back into it.  Some cases in point:

1) teaparty.org: 'Crowd Boos During College Football Game After Obama Name Mentioned…' - Nov. 6


etibuni (signed in using yahoo)

The oath taken by the military is to the "Constitution" and country, not to the president, whoever he may [be]. I guess Obama changed it because he considers himself above our Constitution, Bill of Rights, and above the law of this land.. My thanks to those who booed, and may many more do the same all across this great country of ours. Perhaps then our politicians in Washington will live up their oaths of office and do what should have been done back in 2008. He may be Commander in Chief of our military by virtue of his position as president, however, I would venture to say that the majority of veterans and active duty personnel are against having him as such.

Reply · 12 · Like · Follow Post · 52 minutes ago

  • 276212_100004085058600_1135459113_q.jpg





  • Stan Stanfield · Top Commenter · Stanford University
  • Just for the record: "by virtue of his position as president" does not in tact mean that he is in that position legally. He is a Usurper, for not being a "natural born citizen". Regardless of where he was actually born, he was not - according to his testimony, and his (fraudulent) birth certificate; another issue - born of two U.S. citizen parents, and therefore at best is a DUAL CITIZEN, and therefore is not eligible for that particular office - and that particular federal office ONLY. That special requirement was put in the Constitution for that particular office because that candidate, upon election, would also become the Commander in Chief of the nation's military forces, and the constitutional Framers did not want any person being in that position who had CONFLICTING LOYALTIES OR ALLEGIANCES - like a DUAL CITIZEN would. 
  • It's time and past that the nation uphold its Constitution in this matter. Or the rule of law in the country is dead; and we are subject to ravening wolves. 

  • Reply · Like · 2 seconds ago  [Nov.7]


  •          Stan Stanfield · Top Commenter · Stanford University

             P.S. And I agree with Sue Nemeth Judy: "I thought the service people are  to obey the Constitution, not the president." What is this all about??? That would set up conflicting loyalties for the nation's military. This needs to be investigated. (It may have been a 'testing of the waters'.)

             Reply · Like · 2 seconds ago
---

2) tea party c.c.:  'FAA preps for invasion of 7,500 drones in U.S. airspace within five years' - posted by Nat'l Dir Dee - Nov. 7 (orig. posted at washingtontimes.com Nov. 7)

...

Reply by Douglas W. Rodrigues 2 hours ago

If I see any drones bussing around and there isn't any police situation requiring one, I'll shoot it down.  It's that simple.  I would encourage any other trained shooter to do the same. 
  • Reply
flagUS175.jpg
  • Douglas,

  • I am as angry and frustrated as you are over this invasion of privacy and endangerment of safety (for people traveling in nearby airplanes, as well as families on the ground). I intend to do everything in my (limited) power to stop this Drone-invasion that is clearly designed to benefit Lockheed-Martin, Raytheon, Boeing, and General Dynamics. I intend to scream my revulsions to any and all Senators and Congresspersons that are willing to listen. However, Douglas, you MUST NOT threaten or incite others to threaten to shoot-at or shoot-down any aerial vehicle flying in the USA. Firstly, even foolish people that flash laser-lights at aerial vehicles can and are being arrested...much less your threat to fire upon a Government-owned or Government-operated aerial vehicle (whether manned or unmanned). Next, if you were somehow able to critically damage one of the UAVs, and it crashed into someone's house, their car, or into people, then you would be charged with murder (or at least manslaughter). If the UAV crashed into a schoolyard as a result of your shooting at them, who is to blame for the deaths of children (Government? Douglas?).

  • These UAVs are really expensive for Taxpayers; thus, they have onboard sensors and photographic imagery (usually remoted back to Police/FBI monitors) that is so sensitive it can clearly see/read the date of the penny held in your hand on the ground just before you made the mistake of shooting at one of them. Do you think that the Drone Pilots and their Masters would not immediately be able to tell who you are?

  • Instead Douglas, please use all your energy and anger in best efforts to convince our Politicians that this illegal spying equipment is Unsafe, Unconstitutional, and Fraud/Waste/Abuse of our Taxpayer's money. I will help you, when/if I can.

  • Reply

flagUS175.jpg
  • Quite a sensible reply, Michael.
  • However…there's no harm in finding out where they are being stored, and controlled from.,..
  • And yes - we do really need to take our country back, from the erstwhile totalitarians.  And show them what Americans are REALLY made of.  
  • By-passing our elected representatives, if - as by the looks of things - they are not up to the job. 
  • Reply 
  •      
---

3) tea party c.c.: 'NANNY STATE ALERT: FDA to ban trans fats by regulatory fiat, without an act of Congress' - posted by Nat'l Dir Dee - Nov. 7 (orig. posted at poorrichardsnews.com)


Reply by Stan Stanfield just now  [Nov. 7]

Can somebody who knows the law on these sorts of things - executive-branch agencies taking it upon themselves not just to administer the law but to write the law, in their heavy-handed way - let the rest of us know just how far such agencies can go, and when they have overstepped their legitimate mark?

I consider myself fairly knowledgeable about such things, but I just don't understand this one; that is to say, where the constitutional line is drawn as to what the regulatory agencies can do off their own bat, and what they can't do.   When is something 'law', that got passed by the legislative branch of the federal government - The People's representatives - and when is something simply executive-branch overreach??  Totalitarian ukase???

I understand that it is the job of the FDA to keep unsafe foods and drug products off the interstate market.  But how far can they go in their job, without someone holding oversight on them???? 

And then there's all the unsafe foods that they HAVE allowed on the market.  Like GMO foodstuffs…...

I'm asking: Who Guards the Guards?????

Thanks. 

----

The current executive branch's FDA exceeding of its watch in some instances and not doing its job in others; with GMOs having been proven to be dangerous on the one hand, and many drugs, including vaccines, the same on the other…

…the current executive branch's FAA preparing for an "invasion of 7,500 drones in U.S. airspace within five years;" capable of hunting down 'domestic terrorists,' aka patriots, for culling…

 …National Guard soldiers swearing an oath to "the president" - NOT to the Constitution, as our military are supposed to…

All of this, and more, is an insult to the federal constitutional republic of the United States of America.  Is preparation for "fundamentally transforming" it into but a part of a region of a totalitarian superstate, encompassing the world.

Under the present management.

But, consider…

Either there is a God or there is not.  If there is not, then nothing really matters anyway, and one might as well live exclusively for oneself, independent of the effect of that pursuit on others, as not; for the end of the closed system of life can, then, as easily be seen as that as anything else, a presumed evolutionary value in some degree of cooperation, or whatever.  But basically, it's 'each man for himself' and look out.  Nothing matters but me; no matter how much lipstick a superstate tries to put on the pig.  If there is a God, however, then certain things follow.

It follows for one thing that there is Plan in and Purpose to life - to the entire universe; to the Creation - than just in and for itself only.  Which puts a whole different spin on the entire matter.  So it would behoove us to get clear on this issue; and stop putting that clarity-gaining off.

And lo and behold, we live at a time when we can gain that very clarity.  As have many souls already.  At this time, when there has been a coming together of science and spirituality - of 'reason' and 'mysticism'.

And therefore, it is time for a New World.


I'm not going to go into all those proofs here.  It is up to each person - to each incarnate soul - to travel their own path, on our common journey.

Back to the Oneness from which we all came.

Back to Unity.  


From separation.  Seeming separation.  For a purpose.

A purpose of education.  Of a drawing-out from within.  To 'prove' ourselves to ourselves.

And thus to the Whole, of which we are a Part.

And so it's time, for a new stage of our journey in seeming separation.  A time for a coming together, on a higher level than we have ever been before.

And that higher level does not encompass such lower-level qualities as Power Over.  But instead, such higher-level qualities as Power With.

And Power Within.

So, really, folks:

Let's get ON with it.

With 'it':

What we're here to do.  Fundamentally.  

And stop putzing around with this ignominious stuff, that we are primarily engaged in, as we speak.

As it were.  

And as it was.

In the Old World.

Now coming to its End.

For The New World to take over.

In its rightful place.

On our journey.

Home.



---


P.S. I first came up with the basic 'consideration' thought thread above 55-some years ago now, when I first set out on my dedicated journey to find out the capital-t Truth about life.  What I succeeded in finding at the time was that all that such a mission needed in order to be accomplished fully was overwhelming scientific evidence/proof/verification, that there was, indeed, 'something more than Man' as the be-all and end-all of existence. 
              That evidence is now in.
               So, it's time to get on with the job at hand, of this day and age.  The job, of 
               our Ascension.
               That is to say, for those who are ready for the next, higher stage of the process. unfolding.
               Rather than just more of the same old, same old.
               On the same level as the 'problem'.  To be solved.
               Sooner.
               Or later.  
               As always:
               Your choice.

No comments: