1) from Co-Creating Our Future on Planet Earth: ‘Extremist Mass Media Uses Oregon Standoff to Criminally Profile Truth and Freedom Lovers’ - February 23 (orig, posted at truthandarttv.com - Bernie Suarez - February 21)
(A report of an article in the Washington Post by one Leah Sotille, demonizing the Oregon refuge crowd.)
Your comment is awaiting moderation.
Excellent article. Thanks for the posting of it, Jean.
It would appear to be getting to Crunch Time, if they are now trying to demonize such as the Founding Fathers, and anyone who talks about ‘freedom’. That’s the last card to play – for both sides. And I trust that the Right side of the matter will win out. Trust that, because this is a moral universe – because the universe has purpose, and that Purpose is Good. We are NOT the flies in the web of an evil Spider God. We are here to figure our way out of the 3D hologram temporary prison; better to be looked at as a classroom.
Life is a school. The purpose is to graduate. And we are on that verge. For most of us, at least. So it’s up to us to rise to the occasion. Not let the Bad Guys wear us down.
Based on the U.S. Constitution neither Rubio or Cruz is eligible for the Vice Presidency or the Presidency as neither of them is a "Natural Born Citizen" which has been interpreted to mean the offspring of two U.S. Citizen Parents. Case closed. By the way, the same ineligibility applies to Obama, as his father was never a U.S. Citizen. I'm actually surprised these learned Constitutional Scholars are so inept or corrupted that they have not weighed in on this issue for the last eight years.
- Just to clarify: The constitutional Framers were obviously, by considerable historical evidence, going by the definitive tome of the day on such subjects, E. de Vattel's 'The Law of Nations, Or Principles of Natural Law,' in which he clarifies the definition of a NBC. Which is a person born in the country (or its jurisdictional equivalent) of citizen parents thereof (and particularly the father, from whom nationality descends, legalistically speaking). Thus, both the doctrine of jus sanguinis - law of the blood - and jus soli - law of the soil - apply. THAT makes it "case closed".
3) from patriotsforamerining.com: ‘One World Order vs. Natural Born Citizens by JB Williams’ - newswithviewscom - February 23 - posted by Harry Riley - February 23
J.B. Williams unfortunately, for all of his good efforts in this regard, is muddying the waters on the NBC issue by failing to note the proper definition as codified by E. de Vattel in his definitive tome of the day on the matter, 'The Law of Nations, Or Principles of Natural Law'. In Book One, Ch. XIX, Sect. 212 he clarifies the term, as being a person born in the country of citizen parents of that country - and yes, specifically that of the father, from whom nationality descends, legalistically speaking. (Both the mother and the father were considered One in those days, and the father was the One.) Williams uses wording in Sect. 215 to think that de Vattel is referring to a 'natural born' citizen therein, when all de Vattel is doing there is discussing a 'born citizen'. Sect. 215 does not negate or repudiate Sect. 212, which talks about both the parents - jus sanguinis, in the legal parlance - AND the 'soil' - jus soli. We're talking apples and oranges here.
The best/most comprehensive source of info on this subject that I know of is Atty. Mario Apuzzo's site: puzo1dotblogspotdotcom.
...And for a good reason that this all is not just an academic exercise: