Thursday, 17 March 2016

On Things Hanging By A Thread

1) from ‘Cruz Just Alienated Millions of Potential Supporters by Calling Them This’ - March 17
(“Listen, Donald does well with voters who have relatively low information, who are not that engaged and who are angry, and they see him as an angry voice.
Where we are beating him is when voters get more engaged and they get more informed..”)   


How much lower of information can you get than believing that you are eligible for a job that requires you to have been born in the country to parents who were its citizens at the time of your birth?

Ted, thy name is Hypocrite


Article 2, Section 1 of the United States Constitution states that only natural-born citizens may serve as president. There has never been a legal definition established fot that term. While the clause prevents immigrants who become U.S. citizens through naturalization from becoming president, it does not affect those with dual citizenship. Naturalization is the process through which a citizen of another country who moves the U.S. permanently can acquire citizenship. Cruz never went through that process... a person holding such dual citizenship still meets the requirement for the presidency of being a natural-born citizen.
Cruz did that as a formality to please people like you.


  • nKhosi Mitchina 3 hours ago 

  • Sorry to prick your bubble- however being born to ONE citizen makes him a citizen (if his mother was still a citizen of the USA- no proof of that yet) but not a natural born citizen- that takes TWO Parents that are citizens at the time of birth. That is a problem for Marco, bho and Bobby as well. The Squabble over bho in Hawaii is a smoke screen, he needed both parents to be natural born. Same for Marco, he is at best an anchor baby. The law that folks like to quote says "...born to CITIZENS (plural-more than one) beyond the seas..." It does not say a citizen, it is plural because it takes two to make a baby. And citizenship passed through the father in the Law of Nations.

  • 2
  • Reply

    • Mitchina
      nKhosi 3 hours ago 

    • Well good luck with that - at this point it is merely a theory since we obviously haven't stopped it from happening... or .... it's only takes one parent. Either way - if Obama made it - so will anyone else like Cruz or Rubio. You cannot say with certainty that this is the law of the land since Ovomit is in the White House.

    • 1
    • Reply

                               kibitzer3 Mitchina a few seconds ago (March 17)
      • What can be said with certainty is that Obama is a Usurper in the office, and Ted would be, too, for neither of them being what the constitutional Framers clearly understood the nbc term to mean, for which there is considerable historical evidence. See E. de Vattel's 'The Law of Nations,' Book One, Ch. XIX, Sect. 212: "...the natives, or natural born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are [its] citizens...those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers..." That's the eligibility requirement. It doesn't matter what Acts or Resolutions have been enacted since that requirement: It still stands, and can only be altered by a constitutional amendment.

      • As for your assertion that the term & requirement "does not affect those with dual citizenship," it most certainly does. The whole POINT of the exercise on the part of the constitutional Framers in putting that requirement in their contract for that particular office - and that particular office ONLY - was to make sure that the occupant, who would as well, then, become the Commander in Chief of the nation's military forces, had NO DUAL OR OTHERWISE CONFLICTING LOYALTIES OR ALLEGIANCES OR INFLUENCES. Had SOLE ALLEGIANCE to the U.S.

      • And please don't try to tell me, or others, that two wrongs make a right. The Constitution - and thus, the rule of law in the country - is hanging by a thread, until the Usurper is arrested and held for trial (on a number of charges by now; including fraud, perjury, and treason). Trying to slip Cruz through that same hole blown in the Constitution will be all it takes to sink the nation irrevocably.

      • Either we live by the rule of law or we live by the rule of men. Aka arbitrary law. Aka tyranny. We need to make up our minds. And quickly. The nation is sinking as we speak.

2) from ’Ted Cruz its #1 Enemy of the American Middle Class’ - Dave Hodges - March 16/17 

Stan March 17, 2016 at 11:05 pm (just now gone March 18)
(Your comment is awaiting moderation.) 

Ted Cruz is for Monsanto/GMOs. He has links with the Bushes and the NeoCons. He is not a ‘natural born’ citizen, which by historical definition at the time of the constitutional Framers is a person born in the country of its citizen parents, and is trying to hide that fact, though he is supposedly a constitutional scholar. The NWO crowd – who want the U.S. to be reduced to Third World country standards, and are counting on the Hispanic vote to have a big hand in doing it for them – are treating him like Brer Rabbit: ‘No no – don’t give us Cruz! We don’t want THAT guy! Please don’t throw Ted Cruz into our briar patch – hee hee’.


3) from ‘Lou Dobbs - Trump And Americans Face Dictatorial GOP Elites’ - Rick Wells - March 18
(‘Lou Dobbs - GOP Elites Dictating “No Trump No Voters,” They’ll Decide’.  Dobbs reports, “This group of conservatives, led by Red State founder Erick Erickson sound a bit like an ideological suicide platoon, as they reportedly are considering a number of strategies, including a third party conservative run for the White House…”)

Your comment is awaiting moderation.

Erick Erickson of Redstate banned me from making comments on his site. I could only figure that he was ‘sensitive’ because in the one I attempted to post there, I warned about fascists on the right being just as dangerous an enemy to America as socialists/communists on the left. Now, he’s talking about ‘conservatives’ bolting to a Third Party??? I don’t think so. Maybe by some other more accurate name…

No comments: