Thursday, 1 October 2015

On Lightworkers And Truthseekers

(To a friend of mine back in - or, more accurately, associated with - the spiritual community that I 'hid out in' for a good number of years, before coming back to the States and getting back into the fray:)

I very recently had the occasion to tell a blogger, based on her reply to an email of mine to her regarding a certain issue (the eligibility, or not, of a person for the presidency of the US, as it so happens; a pet peeve of mine), that she had "missed the cut for the 'A' Team".  What did I mean by that.  The 'A' Team in my book is those who live their lives by Truth - and cannot do otherwise.

This guy makes the team.  And boy, does he.

You will note a reference in the presentation to the Presidential election of 2004.  I can remember watching those returns in the basement of Cluny.  When I went to bed, John Kerry had been reported as having a some 3% lead in the exit poll vote in Ohio, which state the election was pretty much coming down to.  The next day I found that in the end, he had lost Ohio by ab. 3%.

This is how they did it.  

Now, I know that these things are not as straightforward as that implies, because it depends on which areas you are counting the votes in.  But this video shows that that was, indeed, a scam. A fraud.  A god damn theft.  

It makes one almost - almost - want to give up, on humanity.

But then, I don't want the bastards to win, either.  So, one hangs in there.


P.S.  And speaking of 'the bastards': It includes the fact that the Democrats, rather than going all out for a cleanup of the voting process in America, decided not just to get mad.  But to get even.  And hence, the win of not only their man in 2008.  But a Usurper on top of it.
     What an art form that process has turned out to be...


Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 19:04:58 -0400
Subject: Revealed - the stolen 2004 Presidential election
 *** Brasscheck needs writers ***

Info here:
BrasscheckTV Report
In 1997, we started writing extensively
about the very real danger of election
fraud being used to stage a coup
in the US.

People said we were crazy.
Anyway, here's an informed, detailed
description of how electronic voting
was used to steal the 2004 Presidential
election. It can be done again.

Brasscheck TV 

P.S. We can't make this unique news 
service available without the help of
our subscribers. 

Please consider joining ranks
of supporters.

Details here: 


Miss a broadcast? 

All Brasscheck TV broadcasts are backed up on 
Facebook and Twitter



Going on vacation? Write us back and 
we'll turn your subscription off and back on.
Just give us the start and stop dates.


How Brasscheck TV works:

You'll receive two videos every day. 

One short one in the morning (US eastern time)
and one longer program in the evening. 

(Don't worry, you don't have to watch them all!)

You can watch them later or delete -- whichever you prefer.

If your email box is getting filled up you can unsubscribe
at any time by clicking the link at the bottom of every
Brasscheck e-mail.

Don't forget you can follow us on Facebook and instead of
receiving emails you can view our latest broadcasts on your 
timeline at your own convenience.
Click here to follow us:
Brasscheck TV
2380 California St.
San Francisco, CA 94115
To unsubscribe or change subscriber options visit:


from ‘Investigate Obama or risk permanent political-media corruption’ - Lawrence Sellin, Ph.D. - October 1 (orig. posted on - September 30)

Reply by Stan Stanfield 2 seconds ago (October 1)

A good article; but constitutionalists/true conservatives need to understand CLEARLY that it is not a matter of "the distinct possibility of an illegal presidency".  Once Obama claimed BO Sr. as his birth father, that was it.  Everybody, wake up to the reality:

The whole POINT of the exercise on the part of the constitutional Framers in putting that particular eligibility requirement in their contract for that particular office - and that particular office ONLY, of all of the federal offices; which is the key to its intent, and definition - was so that the occupant of that office, who would as well then become the Commander in Chief of the nation's military forces, would have NO DUAL/CONFLICTING LOYALTIES OR ALLEGIANCES.  As a naturalized citizen would be subject to.  And as a DUAL citizen would MOST CERTAINLY be subject to.  Like Obama.  And like Cruz.  And Rubio, for that matter.

The historical record is plain on this issue, and definition of the term: a "natural born" citizen is one born on the soil (jus soli) of (in this case, U.S.) citizen parents (jus sanguinis).  That's PLURAL.  As in BOTH.  So that there is SOLE ALLEGIANCE to the nation; in this case, the U.S. - as I say, the whole point of the exercise.  And as for proof of this take on the matter, there is -

* the letter by John Jay (a leading statesman of the time; who, not so incidentally, ended up becoming the first Chief Justice of the new U.S. Supreme Court, such was the respect for his opinion on matters of state) to G. Washington, in his role as Chair of the Constitutional Convention proceedings, warning of the importance, for that office, AND for that particular PURPOSE, for the candidate to be ONLY a "natural born citizen";

* the proposal by Alexander Hamilton, as a delegate to the proceedings, that the president need only be a, quote,"citizen" - and his proposal was SPECIFICALLY TURNED DOWN, in favor of the more stringent NBC requirement.

They were CLEARLY going by the definition of the term in the definitive tome of the day on such matters, E. de Vattel's 'The Law of Nations Or Principles of Natural Law'.  And if any of the delegates were not precisely sure of what they were being asked to vote on, all they would have had to do is turn to their elder and respected mentor, Benjamin Franklin, sitting right there amongst them as a delegate to the same proceedings; who was known to have three copies of de Vattel's tome in his possession.

THERE IS NO QUESTION about this: the term requires the person to have TWO U.S. PARENTS, at a minimum.  Obama does not, did not, qualify.  End of story.  Except for all the shouting, by the Left, and the other NWO lackeys, who have orchestrated this terrible wrong having been wrought upon this nation.

Which must be righted.  And quickly.  Or the Usurper, sensing the noose tightening, will, with his minions, create a Crisis to give him the Opportunity to declare Martial Law; and that will be the declarative, rather than just the effective, end of the Constitution, and thus of the American Republic.  So: Work to be done.  By Oathkeepers; with The People having their backs, in arresting the Usurper, and holding him for trial.  On a whole host of charges by now.  Including perjury.  And treason.  

But let no one try to con you into thinking that there is any legitimate question about the man's illegality in that office.  THERE IS NONE.  It is only a matter of will.  And whose will win out in the end.  That of the American people, in upholding their Constitution, and the Republic.  Or that of the New World Order crowd.  Who would have ALL of humanity fall into the dark hole of their totalitarian global state.

Thus, we patriots stand for the Truth of the matter, for all of humanity.  Never was so much called on for a people to rise to the occasion, since the 300 Spartans standing against the hordes of Persia, and declaring, defiantly and steadily, with hearts of steel:

Molon labe.

No comments: