1) from teaparty.org: ‘VIDEO: Newt Gingrich Makes SHOCK Claim About California Attack… Wake Up, America’ - December 5-6 (orig. posted at conservativetribune.com)
(Newt says ‘it’s war’)
obama is taking america for a pidgin walk. making fools out of all americans. obama gave 150 billion dollars to a regime who wants to kill america and isreal and democrats are too dimwitted to see it. impeach obama now before it is too late. trump and ted cruz are the best bet for america. 2016
Like · Reply · 23 mins
Speaking of taking America for a pidgin walk: the New World Order crowd are driving a coach and horses through the breach in the wall of the Constitution that they managed by obfuscating the issue of the meaning of a 'natural born' U.S. citizen to slip their frontman in there, and are now following through that breach with Republican candidates for the top job, and to hell with the nation's rule of law. A 'natural born' citizen is, and was historically known as, one born on the soil (jus soli) of citizen parents (jus sanguinis). That's PLURAL. As in BOTH. Cruz is no more eligible for the office of POTUS than Obama was, and is.
Conservatives should know better.
2) further from yesterday’s Comments thread from patriotsforamerica.ning: ‘Donald Trump’s mouth is a nuclear weapon….by Wayne Allyn Root’ - posted by Harry Riley - November 30
Reply by Michael M. Regan 4 hours ago (December 6)
Harry. I cannot find one case where a child of only one parent who is a natural born citizen makes it mandatory for that child to become "naturalized". And if it is not mandatory to become naturalized then they are considered natural born citizens. On the U.S. immigration website and Dept of Homeland Security it states one parent. This is indeed confusing. I'm still not convinced either way, so for myself I need to check this out. I'm also going to check with my State Rep to see what they have to say.
Michael........there is no such requirement for a child of a US citizen to be naturalized.
There are citizens and then there are natural born citizens.........anyone born of two US citizens is a "natural born citizen".
Someone born in America, such as Marco Rubio whose parents were Cuban citizens at the time of his birth, is simply a citizen.
Rubio was born in Miami in 1971, his parents were not naturalized US citizens until 1975. So he is a normal citizen but not "natural born citizen". Therefore he is not eligible to become president.
Senator Cruz had a father of other than US citizenship, therefore while Senator Cruz is a citzen because of his mother, he is not a "natural born citizen" as his Father was an alien.
Well If that is true then Obama certianly falls into that category. And again if you must be a natural born citizen to be President of the United States and the courts, the house of Represebatives, the Congress and the Senate on both sides of the aisle have no objection to their eligibility, my next question is "Why"? Has the whole system become that corrupt as many here are saying, and if again that is true what can be done to correct it outside of a total rebellion to overthrow the current government which you say is not your objective for change?
Indeed yes, "the whole system (has) become that corrupt," Michael. And that shows the power of TPTB behind the scenes, trying to take down the American Republic in order to merge [it] into being merely a part of a region of their totalitarian New World Order - which the TPP is an early harbinger of. Right on our doorstep, as we speak. That's how critical it is that conservatives/patriots/Second Amendment supporters/veterans etc. etc. etc. in that vein get their act together NOW.
Oath keepers - both current and retired; and including the Constitutional Sheriffs [& Police Officers] Assn. - need to take the lead, with the rest of us patriots having their backs, as we TAKE OUR COUNTRY BACK from these vipers, who would attempt to hijack this nation, in order to serve their ends. I for one WILL NOT HAVE IT.
Say it loud and clear, patriots: This is MY country: HANDS OFF.
(Michael: I hope you understand that it DOESN'T MATTER what some subsequent court decisions, or Naturalization Acts, say about the matter. All that matters is what the constitutional Framers MEANT - WHAT THE MEANING OF THE TERM WAS - when they put that eligibility requirement in their contract for that (particular) office. The only way that eligibility requirement can be changed is by a constitutional amendment - and THAT HAS NOT HAPPENED. Or we are no longer under the rule of law, but rather under the rule of men. Aka TYRANNY.
And you need to stop confusing the issue, when you talk about the parents being natural born citizens. THEY don't have to be 'natural born' citizens. They only need to be citizens of this country. PLURAL. As in BOTH.)
WAKE UP, AMERICA. YOU ARE ARE BEING VIOLATED. TAKE CHARGE OF YOUR INDIVIDUAL LIFE, AND THE LIFE OF THIS NATION. Or cease to call yourself AMERICANS.