Sunday, 20 December 2015

On Arcane Subjects

Speech To Congress

'Members of Congress, Assembled; Members of the Supreme Court of the United States; Distinguished Guests; Members of the Public listening in. 

‘I have to say that I’m surprised to see so many of you here.  I thought you all just phoned your parts in.  Near as I could tell.  With Obama such a one-man operation, and all.

‘And speaking of the Usurper…

‘I came a little late to this party.  In 2008, I was living, quietly, in the north of Scotland, in the spiritual community that I had been a member of for many  years; having left my home country, of the United States, in early 1976, to join said community, and give some service to the planet in that way, via its educational programs, of a spiritual, and particularly Nature-oriented, nature, and via its emphasis on cultivating the Inner I, for people to develop some sort of spiritual practice for themselves, and their surroundings; and from that space, to be Love in Action.  Thus, I have been keeping an eye on the domestic matters of my beloved home country from afar; and didn’t realize that there was some question about the eligibility of Barack Hussein Obama for the presidential office until some time after the election that year, when my first inklings of a problem regarding that issue made their way to my computer, via several e-newsletter sites that I subscribed to dealing with such political matters.  The problem having to do with the specific issue of the definition of a, quote, ‘natural born’ citizen.     

‘So I go to some of the sites mentioned for reference, one of which is the site of attorney Mario Apuzzo, for excellent example; and there he gave, and still gives, the background regarding the definitive source of the day on such subjects, Emmerich de Vattel’s ‘The Law of Nations Or Principles of the Law of Nature (Applied To the Conduct and Affairs Of Nations And Sovereigns)’.  And therein is the reference to the definition of a ‘natural born’ citizen, which Attorney Apuzzo, and others, have said was the definition of record of the time.  

‘That seemed clear enough, as far as it went.  So I go to some of the sites in rebuttal of this point of view; and I find that in general, their argument - that the term does not mean one born on the soil of citizen parents, as de Vattel described its definition (one born 'on the soil' and 'of the blood') - boils down to the fact that English Common Law describes the birth situation regarding ‘natural born SUBJECTS’. Which we were no longer talking about in regards to the American situation.  These were no longer SUBJECTS.  They were FREEMEN.  And damn proud of it.  Sovereigns in their own right, since their victory over the Mother Country, Great Britain, in the War of Independence; and now busy in codifying what their Republic was going to look like in its specifics, finally in the creation of a Constitution for the United States of America in 1787.

‘The historical record is in fact quite clear on this matter: The constitutional Framers were going by de Vattel’s treatise ’The Law of Nations’ when they codified the eligibility requirements for the office of the presidency of the new nation - and applyiing to that particular federal office only, not so incidentally.

‘And why would that particularity be?  To cut to the chase here: It is quire clear why ‘that would be’, when you consider - as they did; and as a letter at that time from John Jay - a respected statesman of the day, who, not so incidentally, went on to be appointed as the first Chief Justice of the new United States Supreme Court, such was the respect for his political and legalistic acumen - to George Washington, in his role as Chair of the Constitutional Convention proceedings, spells out - that the person occupying that PARTICULAR office was going to be as WELL the Commander in Chief of the nation’s military forces.  The constitutional Framers made as sure as they could in their day at least that that office would be filled ONLY with a person with SOLE ALLEGIANCE to the United States. NO FOREIGN INFLUENCE.  No one with DUAL or otherwise CONFLICTING LOYALTIES OR ALLEGIANCES need apply.  As a naturalized citizen would be subject to.  And as a DUAL citizen would MOST CERTAINLY be subject to.

‘Like Obama.  And like Cruz.  And Rubio, and Jindal too, for that matter.  

‘And as if to emphasize the point for succeeding generations: Alexander Hamilton, as one of the delegates to those proceedings, proposed that the president need only be a, quote, “citizen” - and his proposal was SPECIFICALLY TURNED DOWN, in favor of the more stringent ‘natural born’ citizen requirement.

‘It is not as if the de Vattel treatise on such matters was some dusty, arcane-subject book on some dusty shelf somewhere, far away from public view.  For example, it is known that Benjamin Franklin, himself one of the delegates to those self-same proceedings, was in possession of three copies of that treatise, and had given one of them to the Continental Congress years before, for their elucidation on such subjects as birthing a new nation.  And it became, not only a classic in its time, and used in universities, but as well the basis for what is called American Common Law, or Natural Law; the latter of which is even referenced in our founding documents, such was knowledge of these matters amongst the political leaders of the day..    

‘In sum.  it is extremely clear: the constitutional Framers knew PRECISELY what they were doing, when they included that specific eligibility requirement in their contract for that particular office.

‘And, indeed, it is quite clear that members of both major political parties of our day KNEW as well; when, between 2003 and 2008, and between them, they made a total of eight attempts to get a constitutional amendment including THIS VERY ISSUE started through Congress, to water down the stringent ‘natural born’ citizen requirement - and failed each time even to get their proposals out of committee, such was the sensitivity around this issue.

‘So: What did they do?

‘It is obvious what they did.

‘They colluded.  And they are going down for it.  Lock, stock, and barrel.  As the criminal enterprises that they are.

‘And that includes you folks.  Not just for your political party disappearing out from under you.  But for your failure to RIGHT THIS WRONG, having been done to the rule of law in this country.  This trashing of the Constitution that has taken place - on your watch.  With your constitutional duty and responsibility to reign in a rogue Executive - and an illegal one at that.  

‘And you have blown it. 

‘So, you have no one to blame but yourselves.

‘Oh, I well understand that others are involved in this crime.
I well understand, that Money talks seriously in this town.

‘In any event: It’s good that so many of you showed up for this talk.  This dressing-down.  Because it is to announce the presentation of your pink slips.

‘You are hereby out of a job.

‘And thus, Money will no longer talk in this town.

‘If it does, it will tell a terribly sad, and disgusting, tale.  Of the nature of Man.

‘Of, that is to say, more correctly: one part of the nature of Man.

‘The part that has not recognized - or if it has recognized it, has at least not acted on it, in large measure -  the basic fact that we are spiritual beings having a human experience.

‘And the spiritual part of ourselves is now going to come to the fore.




‘For, you see: The Play is over.  The Play, of the human experience, in the lowest depths of the Creation - its training school, in its realm of separation - seeming separation - and duality, with the divinely-ordained gift of free will.  In order for aspects of the Divine to learn lessons.  As apprentices.  Apprentice gods.  On our way to graduation.  When we pass.

‘And the Ring Pass Not is the ability to abide by, and embody, such qualities as Truth.  And Love.  And Wisdom.  Not Deceit.  And Hate.  And the idea of Power Over.  Rather than Power With; and Within. 

‘Humanity has been birthing a stage of consciousness wherein a Balance was to be struck between the power of the Individual and that of the Collective.  The power of the Collective was lately embodied in the examples of communism and fascism, and has been brought to its peak of completion in the plans and works of powerful people on the planet in the form of their proposed totalitarian New World Order, designed to put all of humanity under the heel of its boot, and reduce the Individual to the status of a mere cipher.  A ‘subject’ of the almighty state, and its powerful - Power Over - oligarchic Master.  

'The power of the Individual has been embodied in the example of the nation of the United States of America, wherein, and as protected by its Constitution - its rule of law - the sanctity of the Individual was codified and celebrated.  

'A clash of civilizations has been taking place, whereby the two sides of the Whole have come clearly to the peak of their positions, requiring, now, a Synthesis of the two: a ‘state’ wherein the Individual is honored, as a ‘spiritual being having a human experience’ - being, in true essence, a soul, beyond the human roles that that soul has taken, over and over again, in the karmic School of Life - but with the awareness, the degree of consciousness, of the need to live in harmony with his or her surroundings, both as to one another, and as to Nature.   

‘Balance is the key, from here on.  And from that place of Balance, we can accomplish wonders.  Including reunion with our galactic neighbors.  And whose DNA is embedded in our very vessels.  Which are far more than the mere meat suits of, and to, our erstwhile Masters; who have lost sight of the larger picture, of this whole scenario, of creation.                

‘But that’s enough on that subject for now.  For now, on the subject before us:

‘You are hereby


‘And may you clean up your act, and atone for your mistakes - and the particular one of not being sufficiently aware that actions - including that of inaction - have consequences - so that you can join us, as we move into

‘the New Era.

‘From The Play.  To

‘The Real Thing.

'May we close the Old paradigm, and welcome in The New, with appropriate celebrations.

'That's all.  For now.

'Oh.  Just one closing comment; as for the judicial branch of the federal government itself.  Which has not covered itself with any glory regarding this matter either.

'I don't know where it thinks to get off regarding the curious subject of 'standing,' in requiring a person, or persons, to show that they have been personally injured by an action for their case to proceed in the court system.  There can hardly be any more of an injury to a sovereign citizen than that his or her rights are being threatened by the relativizing of the law of the land - in this case, the Constitution for the United States of America - whereby the rule of law is being turned into the rule of men - into arbitrary law, to be decided by the powers that be at any given time.   But even a person who has clearly shown personal injury - for having been a candidate for the same office, up against a candidate with a big question mark hanging over his head regarding his constitutional eligibility - seems to have had difficulties in the court system, to be able to advance his case ultimately to the U.S. Supreme Court if necessary, for a final adjudication on this issue, of the 'original intent' of the term in question.

'However, it is all moot now, anyway.  For we will go by the Akashic record in such matters, from here on in.

'In.  To say: into

'the New Era; for all of humanity.

'And that will be all.

'As I say: For now.

'For the definitive, and real


No comments: