Friday, 22 April 2016

More On Cleaning Up The Mess...

...First Things First

1) from ‘Will Congress Continue Whining About Obama Overreach, Sit On Their Cowardly Hands, Ignore Rep Yoho  Resolution, Or Finally Act?’ - posted by Harry Riley - April 19
(‘Yoho Bill H. Res 693 Establishes Select Committee to Investigate Executive Overreach’)

Permalink Reply by Clois Beckwith 20 hours ago (April 21)

And you know why the ballet box is shattered, don't you? It is because our State governments and Federal government have replaced the paper ballots with electronic ballets that can be rigged by the code writers, there is no way to contest the vote and reverify the ballot proces. IT IS RIGGED AGAINST THE VOTER, to keep the asses in Washington and the State, county government in power doing the will of the "Devil" who makes the rules.

  • Reply

Permalink Reply by Dawn C, Lynge-Pruden 11 hours ago (April 22)

what we should do is have a second ballot box, that when a person walks out of a polling place he places a second ballot outside, sort of like a "balance sheet, there are too many instances or examples of voter fraud and the switch of a vote and instead of going through a second round of "the hanging chad" and since there is no true "back-up or accounting" of how a person really voted, there should be a print out of every vote cast (like computers you can print the page) well as soon as you are done casting your vote, you print it and it gets secured by you placing it in a "secured, locked guarded ballot box" so if and when there are questions or accusations we can always count the ballots in that in all things there should always be a back-up, we all know about possible emp strikes or loss of electricity, or Verizon employee strikes that CAN affect computers, so why not a back up for the ONLY true freedom we have left and that is our vote,,,as they say One Vote -One Voice, well I want my voice heard, how about you?

  • Reply
Permalink Reply by Harry Riley 10 hours ago

We need a second opinion, that's for sure.........thanks Dawn.

  • Reply

Permalink Reply by Tim Vance 10 hours ago

That would be one way to maybe make voting in the US a little less corrupt, but the powers that be would never go for it.

  • Reply

Permalink Reply by Stan Stanfield 9 seconds ago (April 22)

Dawn, I like your spunk.  The whole voting business needs a major overhaul, in every state.  Each state can do what its citizenry signs off on for state elections, in our federal constitutional republic, but they should have to pass a stringent certification process to be able to have their state's votes counted in federal elections.  Cleansed voter registration rolls - and I mean CLEANSED, photo ID, back to a paper trail.  Even dipping a voter's finger in purple ink if we need to, to SET THIS NATION BACK TO RIGHTS.  

We have allowed it to become a disgusting situation  It's up to us to clean up the act.

2) from ‘Ted Cruz Busted On Secret Tape Admitting These Are Fake’ - April 14; posted April 22 

Robert Trebes 5 hours ago (April 22)

“‘No,’ Cruz replied. ‘I would say defending the Constitution is a top priority...LOL...Then 'Ted' should not be running for the Presidential Office:

Well, if the 'Power Brokers' who control the RNC continue to disregard the will of the Republican Party voters and crown either Cruz or Rubio or a combination of both and make either of them the 'Official Candidate' of the Republican Party, the RNC legal problems are just beginning! There is a group in Orange County, California that is setting up a 'Legal' challenge to the US Constitutional Eligibility of a non 'Natural Born Citizen' being made the party candidate for President...The RNC will be sued for not being able to 'Certify' the Constitutional Eligibility of their candidate and Cruz and/or Rubio not being eligible. This law suit can not be filed until an ineligible candidate has been named because this group will not have 'Standing' with the court until this happens. The main legal cause of action is due to the 'Definition' of a 'Natural Born Citizen' as defined by the US Supreme Court on several occasions!...

CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret) best explains the categories of citizenship according to Article II of the U.S. Constitution. They are:

Original Citizen ‘Grandfather’ Clause (GFC)

Natural Born Citizen Clause (NBC) The Natural Born Citizenship (NBC) clause status, per natural law and the law of nations, and relevant U.S. Supreme Court rulings, such as Venus (1814), Minor v Happersett (1875), and Perkins v Elg (1939), is determined by whether or not both parents were Citizens of the United States (via birth or naturalization) at the time of the birth of their child in the USA– (not where the parents were born.) Both parents must be U.S. Citizens when their child is born in America for the child to be a “natural born Citizen.” It is important to note that until recent times foreign born women gained naturalized status upon marrying a U.S. Citizen husband or upon the naturalization of the husband under the legal concept of citizenship fusion in a marriage. The Citizenship of the wife was always legally fused to that of her husband until more recent times.

If neither of the above, Kerchner argues the person occupying the White House is Seated by fraud.

Kerchner writes:

“The natural born Citizen clause was placed in the U.S. Constitution in regards to eligibility for President by the founders of our nation and framers of our Constitution specifically to bar persons in the future with foreign influence and foreign citizenship on them at/by birth from ever becoming the Commander-in-Chief of our military after the founding generation had passed away. It was placed in the Constitution for future national security reasons. (Reasons we see materializing today with Obama.) The founding generation was exempt from the natural born Citizen clause in Article II Section 1 of the Constitution. The natural born Citizen clause only applied to future generations of those who would be President upon the passing of the founding generation. These facts were stated in writing in a 1787 letter from John Jay to George Washington, Presiding Officer of the Constitutional Convention.”

Press Esc or click anywhere to return to Mail.


  • kibitzer3
    Robert Trebes a few seconds ago 

  • Thanks for the posting, Robert. Important stuff.

  • For the record, for anyone who wants to see for themselves what the definition for a NBC was that the constitutional Framers were going by: Google E. de Vattel, 'The Law of Nations,' Book One, Ch. XIX, Sect. 212. There it is, as clear as day.

  • Time to get back to the Constitution on this matter. As in others.

Dual citizen, just like my son, I am an American which makes son a natural born! Cruz' mother is an American, makes him a natural & has been proven in court 7 times at least!


         Jeanne Stotler senior74 2 hours ago 
  • She was a Canadian citizen, look it up, she entered Canada from England, where she became a British subject, her married name was Wilson, it gets better the more you read, about both his mother and father.

  • 2
  • Reply
         67N20 Army senior74 3 hours ago
  • NO,, it does NOT,, A Natural Born Citizen is the child of "TWO CITIZEN Parents" !!! Just check out the website mentioned below in "kibitzer3 " comment ! A "DUAL" citizen is NOT a "Natural Born Citizen" !!!

  • 2
  • Reply

    • jaybird
      67N20 Army 2 hours ago 

    • Half a citizen such as Cruz is better that what we have now.
    • Reply
      • 67N20 Army jaybird 2 hours ago 

      • Rafael is an "Establishment owned" , New World Order, agent !!! No better than the "garbage" that`s in the "Rainbow" House !!

      • 1
      • Reply

  • Dave
    senior74 2 hours ago 

  • A natural born citizen must be born on either US soil or a US protected territory or overseas military base.....not Canada or Kenya Africa either....
  • Reply

    • kibitzer3
      Dave a few seconds ago 

    • And born of parents who are citizens. Both jus soli - law of the land - and jus sanguinis - law of the blood - apply, to make one a 'natural born' citizen. That's what makes it 'natural,' for heaven's sake. NO DUAL OR OTHERWISE CONFLICTING LOYALTIES OR ALLEGIANCES OF INFLUENCES. SOLE ALLEGIANCE to the U.S. That's why the constitutional Framers put that eligibility requirement in their contract for that SPECIFIC OFFICE. In PARTICULAR because the occupant of that office would then as well become the Commander in Chief of the nation's military forces.

    • It's all in the historical record. And when our Oath Keepers - current and retired - take the time and trouble to read that record, they will - one would hope - do their duty, and arrest the Usurper in the Oval Office, and hold him for trial, on a whole host of charges by now, including fraud, perjury, and treason.

    • And Cruz - one would hope - would go back to Law School, and take a closer look at that record. And not just take his liberal law school professors' word for what is in the Constitution. As he has obviously done to this point in time. Giving him the benefit of the doubt, there.

No comments: