Friday 15 April 2016

The Really Big Issues Of Our Day


1) from prepareforchange.net: ‘Robert DeNiro: ‘there is a link between vaccines and autism’ - Colaborama - April 15 (orig. posted telegraph.co.uk - David Lawler - April 13)

..
kibitzer3


(Your comment is awaiting moderation.)
.
“The link between the MMR vaccine and autism was first drawn by Andrew Wakefield, a British medical researcher. His 1998 study was later found to be fraudulent, and he was barred from practising medicine in the UK.” Totally misleading. His study was NOT found to be “fraudulent”. It was labeled as such [principally] by the London Sunday Times, where a Murdoch son, who sits on the Board of the Times, also sits on the Board of GSK, a/the vaccine manufacturer in the UK. It was a smear job, by their ‘journalist’ – paid hack – Brian Deer. If you want to talk about fraud in this matter, talk about him and the Sunday Times, orchestrating a witchhunt on Wakefield; who ended up having to come to live in the U.S. to try to re-establish his career, as an honest researcher – but too outspoken for the likes of our erstwhile Masters. To whom money talks very big.  [And big money talks even bigger.]

—

2) from westernjournalism.com: ‘Wow: John Kasich’s Wife Just Let Slip Why He’s REALLY In The Race - ‘I’m Going To Be Honest With You…’’ - Conservative Tribune - Kevin Whitson - April 15 (orig. posted at wnd.com - Chelsea Schilling  - April 13/14; my comment below posted there April 15) 
(Kasich’s wife says the whole point of his candidacy - who has been bankrolled by G. Soros - is to block Trump.)

..

The Republican Party is part of the problem, not part of the solution. That is proven by the fact that they are allowing candidates to run for the office of the president under their aegis who are ineligible for that office - Jindal, Rubio, and Cruz left still standing - for the same reason that Obama is sitting in the Oval Office illegally: for none of them being a 'natural born' citizen.

Sinister and malevolent people, including shyster-lawyer types, try to say that the issue is not clear, that there is question about the meaning of the term. There is no question about the meaning of the term when it was put in the Constitution as an eligibility requirement for that particular federal office - and that particular office ONLY; which is a tipoff as to that meaning, and intent. One of the eligibility requirements for the office is that the occupant needs to be a person born in the country to parents who are its citizens - the definition of a 'natural born' citizen at the time, and still an eligibility requirement, absent a constitutional amendment to the contrary. The term comes from the definitive tome of the day on such subjects, E. de Vattel's 'The Law of Nations, Or Principles of Natural Law,' which it is known that the constitutional Framers were well aware of (evidence for which statement too lengthy to go into here). The key point being that they wanted the occupant of that office, who would as well then become the Commander in Chief of the nation's military forces, to have NO DUAL OR OTHERWISE CONFLICTING LOYALTIES OR ALLEGIANCES OR INFLUENCES. Had SOLE ALLEGIANCE to the U.S. 

And for good reason. As we have seen, to our detriment, in the illegal occupancy of that office by Barack Hussein Obama (or whatever his real, birth name is; since we don't know, not having seen a true birth certificate for the imposter). We have a constitutional crisis on our hands already. We should not let it be compounded, by letting the Republican Party try to make two wrongs make a right, in running an ineligible, non-natural born citizen candidate for the office.

And as for the other political party: Hillary needs to be arrested, on a whole host of charges, including running an unsecure email system whilst SoS, and soliciting bribes from foreign governments for her and Bill's Clinton Foundation personal slush fund. So: We need to deal with the Usurper in the Oval Office, the ineligible candidate from the Republican Party, and the criminal candidate from the Democrat Partry, before we can even begin to think of any elections in November. And we had better be quick about it all. The Usurper could take advantage of a deliberately created 'state of national emergency' and his subsequent declaration of martial law before we get the cavalry - in the form of Oath Keepers, with patriots having their backs - to come to the rescue of the federal constitutional Republic of the U.S.A. And thus keep it out of the hands of our erstwhile masters, in the establishment of their totalitarian New World Order. Which is what this whole thing - of the weakening of the Constitution, and its rule of law for the nation - has been all about.

 --

 N.B. I 'get' that some people fear a race/civil war if any move is made to unseat Obama.  My response:

 Not necessarily.  People can understand the truth of things once it is explained to them clearly.  We are not dumb animals; contrary to the belief of some.  We have intelligence - all of us; to varying degrees; but all are intelligent enough to understand right from wrong. Truth from untruth.  I give us all that credit.

 Now, as to a civil war on the grounds of patriots opposing those who are attempting to hijack the American Republic...that's another matter.  And I trust that Oath Keepers, rising to the occasion, will keep the nation from having to resort to that degree of cleansing in order to set things right.

 --  

 3) from PEERS/WantToKnow - April 15: 

 Join the 14,447 informed, caring subscribers to this list (two emails/week)
The Mission of WantToKnow.info:
To provide our readers with reliable, verifiable information on major cover-ups,
and to serve as a call to work together for the good of all
This message is also available online at this link.
We're $5,400 in the red for 2016. Please make a donation.
Support us by using this amazon.com link at no extra charge to you.
Bookmark and Share
Cancer Cures Video.
"One of the great things about [potential cancer cure] DCA is that it's a simple compound, in the public domain, and could be produced for pennies a dose. But that's also a problem, because big drug companies are unlikely to spend a billion dollars or so on large-scale clinical trials for a compound they can't patent."
  ~~  Newsweek article on potential cancer cure DCA, 1/23/07
The alleged cancer cures presented in the excellent video documentary "Cancer: The Forbidden Cures" are well worth exploring. Though not yet proven under rigorous scientific protocols which are very expensive, there is no doubt that thousands of people doctors had sent home to die were cured after taking the cancer treatments presented in this engaging documentary. If you or someone you know is dealing with cancer, this essay and film provide a wealth of invaluable information on negotiating the daunting labyrinth of cancer treatment.
Regardless of the efficacy of the potential cancer cures presented in this documentary, the fact that top medical officials undeniably suppressed these treatments is enough to warrant attention. The fact that big money was offered to buy the rights to the some of these controversial cancer cures also attests to their value. And the fact that so many people sent home to die by the medical establishment now are alive and swear by these treatments also suggests at least some value.
A highly informative 20-minute version of "Cancer: The Forbidden Cures" is available at the link below. If you want to understand the complex world of alternative cancer treatments and be inspired with real hope for finding a cure, this is a must-watch video.
If you don't have time, at least watch the five-minute version at this link. And for those interested, click here for the entire 72-minute documentary. Though providing a much fuller story and some excellent information, the full version of "Cancer: The Forbidden Cures" has a tendency to paint allopathic medicine as all bad. Clearly Western medicine has its place. Yet there is ample evidence that it can be somewhat myopic in its views on alternative medicine. As there are so few good documentaries on this topic, the film's producers can be forgiven for their anti-allopathic sentiments.
"Cancer: The Forbidden Cures" presents Essiac, the Hoxsey treatment, Gerson therapy, laetrile, and shark cartilage as potential cancer cures. For more on these, click on the links provided. This film explains how it is virtually impossible for these inexpensive, natural treatments to receive government approval. The FDA requires extremely expensive clinical trials to demonstrate the efficacy of treatment, yet due to minimal profit in natural cures, trials will likely never be conducted, thus preventing approval of natural treatments, even if they do cure cancer. 
The Medical Establishment Doesn't Want an Inexpensive Cancer Cure
Even more problematic are those within the medical industry who have a vested interest in preventing alternative treatments from even gaining publicity, let alone approval. Chemotherapy drugs net billions of dollars in profits every year, fattening the wallets of physicians and drug company officers and stockholders. The respected American Medical Association (AMA) also reaps major profits from cancer medication advertisements and promotions.
Few people are aware of the unsavory history of the AMA and its Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA). This influential organization and its leaders became wealthy and powerful in the first half of the 20th century through selectively granting a seal of approval for untested drugs only to companies who would pay hefty fees to the AMA, and through major income from the tobacco industry for JAMA's promotions of cigarette smoking and its false claims about cigarette safety. For a brief essay describing these corrupt practices and more, click here.
"Cancer: The Forbidden Cures" reveals that the controversial man who was chief editor of the JAMA for 26 years, Morris Fishbein, worked tirelessly to prevent any potential cancer cure that was not under the control of the medical establishment from seeing the light of day. Fishbein, who was glowingly featured in a 1937 cover story of Time magazine, was actively involved in suppressing the alleged cancer cures in two of the five cases presented in this documentary, as well as many others not mentioned.
An article in Time only two years later describes how Fishbein and the AMA were indicted for profiteering through limiting a patient's choice of doctor and preventing competition among doctors. Fishbein was also the main force behind the AMA's promotion of smoking. After leaving the AMA, he became consultant to a tobacco company dedicated to minimizing any link between smoking and cancer. Quite the opposite of the New England Journal of Medicine's courageous chief editor Marcia Angell, who worked tirelessly to expose the blatant manipulations of the drug industry, Fishbein was seen by many as much more interested in making money than in protecting public health.
"Cancer: The Forbidden Cures" further shows how famous cancer institutes like the esteemed Memorial Sloan–Kettering Cancer Center prevented both studies and the publication of any information that might show that alternative treatments did, in fact, have significant cancer cure rates. Read what Sloan-Kettering's own assistant director of public affairs, Dr. Ralph Moss (now a top advocate of alternative cancer therapies), had to say about this in his essay at this link. Moss was fired simply for speaking the truth of what he saw. Many in the medical establishment clearly have a vested interest in suppressing any natural cancer cures.
The Good News
The exciting news is that thanks to the Internet and caring people like you, the truth is reaching ever greater numbers of people around the globe. Whereas in the past, top medical officials could manipulate the press and public opinion with their power and prestige, the Internet now allows any discerning citizen to explore what is really going on behind the scenes. Quality websites like WantToKnow.info are using reliable, verifiable information to educate the public and inspiring us to work together to build a brighter future for us all.
Read below key excerpts from recent major media articles showing fascinating potential cancer cures that are getting neither the funding nor the public attention they deserve. A few highly revealing articles like this have made news, yet what should have been exciting, front-page news is often reported only by one media source and then dropped. Thankfully, by compiling these key, isolated reports, we can show what is going on here and work together to bring these promising treatments the attention and funding they deserve.
The media's continuing lack of coverage on this vital topic is quite disappointing. For an excellent two-page summary showing how the media is controlled on key topics like this, click here. Yet now you can help to educate others and build the critical mass necessary by spreading this message. Once we reach critical mass, the media will be forced to report on these matters and the public will demand change. See the "What you can do" section at the end of this message for more. And thanks for caring. Together, we are making a difference.
Excerpts from Revealing Media Articles on Cancer Cures

A New Way to Fight Cancer?
2007-01-23, Newsweek
http://www.newsweek.com/2007/02/22/a-new-way-to-fight-cancer.html
There are no magic bullets in the fight against cancer: that's the first thing every responsible scientist mentions when discussing a possible new treatment, no matter how promising. If there were a magic bullet, though, it might be something like dichloroacetate, or DCA, a drug that kills cancer cells by exploiting a fundamental weakness found in a wide range of solid tumors. So far, though, it kills them just in test tubes and in rats infected with human cancer cells; it has never been tested against cancer in living human beings. DCA ... is an existing drug whose side effects are well-studied and relatively tolerable. Also, it's a small molecule that might be able to cross the blood-brain barrier to reach otherwise intractable brain tumors. Within days after a technical paper on DCA appeared in the journal Cancer Cell last week, the lead author, Dr. Evangelos Michelakis of the University of Alberta, was deluged with calls and e-mails from prospective patients–to whom he can say only, "Hang in there." DCA is a remarkably simple molecule. It acts in the body to promote the activity of the mitochondria. Researchers have assumed that the mitochondria in cancer cells were irreparably damaged. But Michelakis wondered if that was really true. With his colleagues he used DCA to turn back on the mitochondria in cancer cells–which promptly died. One of the great things about DCA is that it's a simple compound, in the public domain, and could be produced for pennies a dose. But that's also a problem, because big drug companies are unlikely to spend a billion dollars or so on large-scale clinical trials for a compound they can't patent. (Anyone interested in helping can click here)
Note: For a 2010 follow-up by Dr. Michelakis with promising results, click here and watch the 10-minute video at this link. For the DCA website, click here. Thank you Newsweek for publishing this important article. Why haven't any other mass media reported this major story? Why aren't millions of dollars being poured into research? Notice that even Newsweek acknowledges that the drug companies are not interested in finding a cancer cure if they can't make a profit from it. Some suspect the drug companies have often suppressed cancer cures found in the past. For one amazing example of this, click here. More on DCA available here.
Injected Cells Cure Tumors in Mice
2006-05-09, Los Angeles Times
http://articles.latimes.com/2006/may/09/science/sci-cancer9
White blood cells from mice that are naturally immune to cancer cured tumors in other mice and provided them with lifelong immunity to the disease, researchers reported Monday. The finding indicates the existence of a biological pathway previously unsuspected in any species. A small team of researchers is working to understand the genetic and immunological basis of the surprising phenomenon. Preliminary studies hint at the existence of a similar resistance in humans. Researchers hope that harnessing the biological process could lead to a new approach to treating cancer. But Dr. Zhen Cui of Wake Forest, whose team published the findings in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, said he expected rapid replication of the results because the findings were so clear-cut and easily observed. "This is a truly remarkable phenomenon -- and it really needs confirmation from other institutions," he said. The team took white blood cells from the immune mice ... and injected them into mice already carrying a variety of tumors, some of which were extremely aggressive. In every case, the cancers were destroyed, even if the cells were injected at a point distant from the tumor. Healthy tissues were not affected. The mice that received the cells, furthermore, were protected from new tumors for the rest of their lives. The researchers have no idea how the immunity continues.
Note: Why was this not in the headlines and not given a title like "Cancer Cure Found for Mice"? Most major papers didn't even report the story, and an article in the New York Times was simply titled "A Strain of Mice Appears Able to Resist Cancer Cells." Could it be that the power brokers in the medical industry know that a cancer cure would cause huge financial losses for them? To learn what happened to an incredible scientist who discovered a cancer cure for humans many decades ago, click here.
In Tests, Vitamin D Shrinks Breast Cancer Cells
2010-02-22, ABC News
http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/OnCall/study-vitamin-d-kills-cancer-cells/story?id=99...
Doctors have known that low levels of vitamin D are linked to certain kinds of cancers as well as to diabetes and asthma, but new research also shows that the vitamin can kill human cancer cells. The results fall short of an immediate cancer cure, but they are encouraging, medical professionals say. JoEllen Welsh, a researcher with the State University of New York at Albany, has studied the effects of vitamin D for 25 years. Part of her research involves taking human breast cancer cells and treating them with a potent form of vitamin D. Within a few days, half the cancer cells shriveled up and died. Welsh said the vitamin has the same effect as a drug used for breast cancer treatment. "Vitamin D enters the cells and triggers the cell death process," she [said]. "It's similar to what we see when we treat cells with Tamoxifen," a drug used to treat breast cancer. The vitamin's effects were even more dramatic on breast cancer cells injected into mice. After several weeks of treatment, the cancer tumors in the mice shrank by an average of more than 50 percent. Some tumors disappeared. Similar results have been achieved on colon and prostate cancer tumors in mice.
Note: For key excerpts from dozens of major media articles relating fascinating, but little-known information on potential cancer cures, click here. For those looking for an effective cancer treatment, you can find useful information at the websites available here, here, here, and here.For a highly rated book describing many promising alternative cancer cures in detail, click here. And if you haven't watched the 20-minute version of "Cancer: The Forbidden Cures," watch it now at the link below.
What you can do:
  • Inform your media and political representatives of this important video on suppressed cancer cures. To contact those close to you, click here. 
  • Read concise summaries of revealing major media reports on cancer cures. 
  • For a highly revealing article on the suppression of Royal Rife's amazing cancer cure, click here. 
  • Learn more on how to improve your health in this lesson from the Insight Course. 
  • Visit our Health Information Center at www.WantToKnow.info/healthinformation. 
  • Spread the news on the cancer cures video to your friends and colleagues, and bookmark this article on key news websites using the "Share" icon on this page, so that we can fill the role at which the major media is sadly failing. Together, we can make a difference. 
Bookmark and Share
Finding Balance: WantToKnow.info Inspiration Center
WantToKnow.info believes it is important to balance disturbing cover-up information with inspirational writings which call us to be all that we can be and to work together for positive change. For an abundance of uplifting material, please visit our Inspiration Center.
See our exceptional archive of revealing news articles.
Explore the mind and heart expanding websites managed by the nonprofit PEERS network:
www.peerservice.org - PEERS websites: Spreading inspiration, education, & empowerment
www.momentoflove.org - Every person in the world has a heart
www.personalgrowthcourses.net - Dynamic online courses powerfully expand your horizons
www.WantToKnow.info - Reliable, verifiable information on major cover-ups
www.weboflove.org - Strengthening the Web of Love that interconnects us all
Subscribe here to the WantToKnow.info email list (two messages a week)
Posted by at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)