Wednesday, 14 September 2016

It Is Clearly Now Time

from an article on entitled ‘Internet Censorship Plot - MSM, Social Media Form Cabal To Control All Content’ - Rick Wells - September 14:

The end of our freedom of speech, particularly on the Internet is coming together at breakneck speed, with outrage building upon outrage.

“For about the last year or so, Facebook and Twitter have been engaged in online censorship of content. Basically anything that opposes the globalist agenda is at risk of being choked out of circulation, pulled down from groups, taken down from pages and their authors sanctioned. The penalties for expressing opposing views can be severe, including having your account completely cancelled. In Europe there can be lengthy jail sentences and fines.

Recently Obama announced he’s handing our internet over to the enemies of American self-rule and our survival as a free nation, his globalist comrades under the UN. He has no authorization from Congress to be giving away what belongs to the American people. He’s just like a shoplifter filling his pockets as he heads out the door, throwing a big bone to his co-conspirators while he still can.

Now the next shoe to drop has been announced by the same corporate information controllers that have been targeting free speech, both here and particularly aggressively in Europe, Facebook and Twitter. These two monopolies on information sharing that are already in violation of anti-trust laws and should be broken up, are now further consolidating their strangle hold on our ability to communicate our views freely among one another.

“They announced on Tuesday they were forming a partnership with news organizations, including Agence France-Presse to “create a coalition of media and technology groups seeking to filter out online misinformation and improve news quality on social networks.” Someone will be determining what is acceptable according to their subjective standards, to an even greater degree than is already being done  in a semi-covert manner. It is the definition of censorship.

“Who and what gives them the right? Their global ambitions. From an American perspective, our freedom of speech and our freedom of assembly are being impacted. In Europe they already have their freedoms compromised to a greater degree but it still is significant. Hate speech laws will likely be the justification for more draconian censorship as they have been already throughout Europe. In Germany Angela Merkel has allied herself with Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg to actively target those speaking out against her destructive, suicidal open border policies.

“They are simply making the move to eliminate our ability to speak out and thereby provide themselves with cover for their treasonous attacks.”

Ah, yes.  The old ‘hate speech’ canard.  To speak against ‘open borders policies’: hate speech.  (Or ‘racist’.  Or something.  Fill in your favorite demonizing word.)  To query the ‘6 million Holocaust’ meme: hate speech.  To say anything against TPTB’s policies: hate speech…  He goes on: 

“Breitbart News reported, ‘First Draft News, which is backed by Google, announced Tuesday that some 20 news organizations will be part of its partner network to share information on best practices for journalism in the online age.’

“These will not be the benign ‘best practices’ that they claim they are. They will be what conservative patriots are already faced with on a daily basis, censorship standards that, if not met, will result in content being disallowed. If patriotic speech is not allowed, those views will disappear from the dialogue and the result will be a population that increasingly shares the globalist outlook.

“The reason for the creation of the internet in the first place may have been to manufacture an environment for global communication that is heavily relied upon and which can be easily manipulated and controlled. The push is on to bring Africa online with Zuckerberg, Google and others. The objective now clearly seems to be worldwide participation in a global system that is rooted in the world socialism perspective.

“Jenni Sargent, managing director of First Draft, said ‘Filtering out false information can be hard. Even if news organizations only share fact-checked and verified stories, everyone is a publisher and a potential source.’ Here’s three questions for you, Ms. Sargent. What gives you the right to decide which ideas people are allowed to be exposed to, do we also have the option of shutting down your blog or your alliance? If not, why not?

“She said, ‘We are not going to solve these problems overnight, but we’re certainly not going to solve them as individual organizations.’ But as a global monopoly, they can’t help but succeed.

“The Internet Nazi said the coalition will develop training programs and ‘a collaborative verification platform,’ as well as a voluntary code of practice for online news. It will be voluntary to the extent that people will choose to comply if they want access to an audience.”

“Training and collaboration by a big brother entity are not necessary and are counterproductive. If someone is putting out bad product, the marketplace will take care of it. But the objective isn’t improvement, it’s about uniformity, compliance, power and control.

“As if the mainstream media is an indicator of success and what is desirable in truth in reporting, Sargent said, ‘We live in a time when trust and truth are issues that all newsrooms, and increasingly the social platforms themselves, are facing.’ Again, who the Hell does she think she is?

“‘Each partner is committed to sharing knowledge, developing policies and devising training in how journalists use the social web to find and report news.’ All of those ‘goals’ are pointless without a system of enforcement and mandated compliance, which is where this is headed.

“It was not something that could have been accomplished while the Internet was under American control. Now that the UN criminals are taking over, our protections afforded under the Constitution are vanishing right before our eyes. Our rights to free speech and assembly will no longer exist…”

Well spotted, Rick.  

So.  What is this saying, in effect.

It is saying that it is time for the White Hats to take over.  For, this planet will NOT succumb to the Dark.  Those days, of duality, are over; now that things have gone global. To say: Complete.

I was feeling it in my bones when I watched the recent video of Hillary waiting to enter her Secret Service van after bailing out of the memorial service for 9/11, because of not feeling well - ‘dehydrated,’ was the excuse.  And seeing her obviously about to collapse, if it weren’t for her S.S. escort, and the big black guy who appears to be her onsite medical care technician, complete with a syringe at the ready.  For what?

The speculations are not sure, run the range from ’Subcortical Vascular Dementia’ (which she was diagnosed with back in 2013) to Parkinson’s to MS to ALS to tumors of the brain and lungs to syphilis, to some combination, and exacerbated by the various drugs that she is taking, for a variety of her ailments.  Certainly not the ‘pneumonia’ that her doctor has tried to put out.  Who deserves to be stripped of her license to practice, for being either incompetent or corrupt or both.

And I’ll concentrate in this blog on this issue, of corruption, plain and simple.  Only very dangerous, when we are talking about the presidency of the United States.

And I refer particularly to the alarming sight of all of her ‘handlers’ gathering around her at the van, and screening her collapse from view by onlookers (although not, fortunately, from a couple of people with cameras, recording this event from a couple of different angles).  As if on cue - and precisely as if in something like the old Soviet Union - they immediately flocked together from their various assigned stations and turned outwards towards We the People and said, in effect, ‘Nothing to see here, folks.  Just keep moving on.’  

This sort of obscenity is called forth when the Dark is on its last legs, as it were.

To these arrogant bastards who are trying to pull the wool over the eyes of the American public, I say:

‘A lot to see here, gang.  And it is you who will be moving right along.  Out of this picture.  For, this picture is going Up.

‘With you.

‘Or without you.’

As for ‘this picture’.  

I am reminded of some themes that came to me, many years ago, when I came up with the idea of a film about a youngish American living in an out-of-the-way village in Mexico, bordering on the ocean.  I filled it with all sorts of symbology: A young American girl, just ‘coming of age,’ having just graduated from university, and stopping off to see her father before heading off for a vacation in Europe (Innocent America about to meet up with and run the risk of going the way of the enervated and corrupt Old World); her father with a couple of business ‘partners,’ ostensibly on vacation but in fact engaged in some sort of skullduggery (price fixing between supposed competitors, I allude to), as Three Smart Guys, selling out The American Dream; the youngish American, who in a Prologue we see, or at least are led to ’see,’ anonymously among a lot of American troops returning to the States from a war in some far-away place with strange-sounding names, here in this off-the-beaten path assisting a mature Mexican woman to run an artist colony, having turned his back on his home country, and being involved in Third World activity.  The whole ‘story’ leading to a clash of cultures, and a game-changing tragedy.  

A lot of ‘leads’ to corruption, then.  Which is, indeed, a vital part of my story.  Which leads ultimately to a strange - different - sight: of a bunch of young people building a city out in the middle of nowhere, with in its middle a pyramid; at the base of which, right at the end of my film, we see, in an overhead shot, our protagonist - looking very small, and ill-defined; more like a rod of energy - going to meet a figure having come from a landed UFO, the two of them looking, in our shot, like the reverse of an act of mitosis, as seen under a microscope.  

A coming together, then, in The End.  With, along the way, a seemingly throw-away shot of our protagonist having shown a young Mexican boy, whom he had befriended, a ‘trick’ with some ball bearings lined up by wires on a ‘contraption,’ whereby he set them going, one by one, and had the boy watch when, after a short while of each of them swinging in its arc in its own time, they suddenly all swung together, in unison.

I wasn’t sure, precisely, what all I was trying to indicate then.  I knew it had to do with time, and a Coming Together, and various other themes, but especially of the one of the Light vs. Dark.

But I understand it now.

So - in a way: Thank you, Hilary.  You have helped bring The Play to

its natural conclusion.

For, the Dark will NOT win out over the Light, on a global, ‘completed’ level.

It is against the very nature of things.

All of it, having been

for a purpose.

For, the universe has purpose.

And that purpose is Good.

Another theme that has come to me, in my life.

Now to be, not just worked out, but landed, on the factual level.

It all being a matter of harmonics, and all that jazz.

P.S. And just for the record: I was also inspired, for whatever reason I knew not at the time - this was the 1960-'61 time period - to have my lead character (with roots in American values, but disgusted with the way that the nation had become corrupted) say, a bit hesitantly, to a young male Hispanic, former political enemy of his - and crucially involved in the intrigue that I got them all into in the story - who had decided, for deeper reasons than The Games That People Play, to join him on his next steps out of the collapsed scene that they had been inhabiting, and who asked my protagonist, in effect, 'Whither we goest,' that the wanted "to be in on the building of a city".  My sense was of a City of Light; whatever that might be, and mean, from my Intuitive Self.  Which reference has also been made by other people over these ensuing years.  With more detail.
     Watch this space.

No comments: