from wnd.com: ’Best Immigration Speech We’ve Ever Seen’ - Paul Bremmer - September 3
(“During his major immigration speech in Phoenix this week, GOP presidential candidate Donald Trump did not promise to round up and deport all of the illegal immigrants currently in the country.
“But he is not going soft, according to one leading immigration expert; he is simply growing more mature as a messenger…”
- If we don't get our heads on straight, the muslimes will gladly remove
- Yes, what is the first step then?
kibitzer3 runningbear • a day ago (September 3)
To have Oath Keepers arrest the Usurper, and hold him for trial (on a whole host of charges by now, including fraud, perjury, and treason). Everything else will fall into place from there.
The fish rots from its head.
- A snake may be dead but the head can still kill.
- His legacy is the head of the snake. Things he has set in motion.
- Kill the dragon but what about the dragon's eggs that will be hatching, and when?
- There will always be people who claim the right to use the eggs as laws for their agendas.
- There must be a way to unring the bell that has been rung? That is why he smiles because what has been started Can't be easily stopped. He depends upon the lazy sheeplle to set idle and accept what is.
- To answer your question, and to follow up on my comment:
The beauty of arresting him - primarily for being illegally in the office (thus the fraud and perjury charges) - instead of an impeachment process - which is for legally sitting presidents anyway - is that that way, all of the legislation that he has signed into law, and all of the E.O.'s and P.D.'s that he has issued, and all of the appointments that he has made - including to the SCOTUS, and lesser courts - go with him, into the trash bin. It needs to become as though he had never been there, since he has never been there legally.
And I could go on, about what we do with a Congress that has failed in its constitutional duty to rein in a rogue executive; and what do we do with both major political parties, who have obviously colluded in attempting to put ineligible candidates in that office - the Dems having succeeded with the Usurper, and the Repubs having tried, as (calculated) follow-up, with Cruz and Rubio and Jindal . But you get the idea.
For the record: A 'natural born' citizen is a person born in the country (or its equivalent, like a military or diplomatic mission) of parents who are citizens thereof. (That's what makes it 'natural,' for heaven's sake.) It's from the definitive tome of the day of the constitutional Framers on such matters, E. de Vattel's 'The Law of Nations, Or Principles of Natural Law,' which there is considerable historical evidence that they were indeed going by (including the fact that it was taught in the universities of the day; and was the basis for American Common Law, or Natural Law). The whole POINT of the exercise was to make sure that the occupant of that office - who would as well, then, become the Commander in Chief of the nation's military forces; the key factor in the matter, according to the record - would have NO DUAL OR OTHERWISE CONFLICTING LOYALTIES OR ALLEGIANCES OR INFLUENCES. Had SOLE ALLEGIANCE to the U.S. And that eligibility requirement for that office STILL STANDS, absent a constitutional amendment to the contrary.
And we are seeing the wisdom of the Founding Fathers in this matter, in the illegal occupancy of the Oval Office by The Great Pretender, BHO.