Sunday, 11 September 2016

On One Stop Shopping

1a) from ‘Obama Is Registering Undocumented Immigrants by the Millions’ - Dave Hodges - September 9/10
(“Obama, on behalf of Clinton’s candidacy is at it again! Obama and DHS are registering millions of undocumented immigrants to vote…” - but they aren’t going to be allowed to become citizens.   Too much nice money is at stake…)

Stan September 11, 2016 at 12:12 am
(Your comment is awaiting moderation.) 

For the record, Dave, there is no such LEGAL – that is to say, CONSTITUTIONAL – thing as ‘anchor babies’. I don’t care what any Statute issued by Congress may say, or any ruling by some sitting SCOTUS. The idea is the brainchild of some shyster lawyers, in misinterpreting the 14th Amendment. Quote:

“All persons born or naturalized in the United States, AND SUBJECT TO THE JURISDICTION THEREOF…” As the framers of the Amendment clarified, they were NOT making legal someone whose parents were here illegally.  Such children were, are, still ”subject to the jurisdiction” of the country of origin of their parents, AS THEIR PARENTS WERE AND ARE. They are citizens of the home country of their parents.

NOTHING TRUMPS THE CONSTITUTION BUT A CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT. And when we return to the rule of law in this country – i.e., the Constitution – those children will rightly join their parents, in either returning voluntarily to their home countries, or facing deportation.

Some leniency can be granted such families by allowing them to apply for admission through the front door. As Trump has indicated. But that is already a stretch; and needs to be recognized as such. ILLEGAL ALIENS DO NOT GET PRIORITY OVER LEGAL IMMIGRANTS. In any way, shape, or form.

It’s time we got serious around here, about the continued status of the federal constitutional republic of the united States of America.

Stan September 11, 2016 at 12:24 am
(Your comment is awaiting moderation.) 

P.S. Pardon a couple of errors in the above comment. I wish you had an Edit button. Sometimes these computers take on a life of their own, and make spellings that they choose.

And while I’m at a P.S.: Let me say that such a return to the rule of law in this country will also include arresting the Usurper in the Oval Office – by Oath Keepers – and holding him for trial, on a whole host of charges by now, including fraud, perjury, and treason. As part of a general cleaning-out of the federal government. Whereby all of the legislation that the Usurper has signed into law, and all of the E.O.’s and P.D.’s that he has issued, and all of the appointments that he has made – including to the SCOTUS, and lesser courts – go with him, into the trash bin.

And we prove that we are serious about TAKING OUR COUNTRY BACK, from those who would attempt to overthrow it, and make it but a part of a region of their totalitarian New World Order. Their time needs to have come. Now.

1b) ‘Will Big Oil Win Clinton The White House?’ - Dave Hodges - September 9
(“This is a case of the old guard of the New World Order vs. the new money of the New World Order.” - I.e., Rockefeller et al vs. Rupert Murdoch, who Dave feels did a deal with Trump on activating the big oil fields (the ‘North Shore’) in Alaska; which the Old Guard do not want, for its cutting their oil monopoly from the Middle East, and for bringing the price of oil even cheaper.
As in other times and places: ‘It’s the oil, stupid.’)

Stan September 11, 2016 at 12:58 am
(Your comment is awaiting moderation.)

Dave, as for David Rockefeller: You and your followers may be interested to know that a Rockefeller was caught on video admitting two things: 1) They were backing a vaccination campaign in some Third World countries that had targeted young females, ostensibly with a tetanus vaccine, but it was laced with an anti-fertility ingredient. The rationale: U.S. national security, from economic refugees wanting to flood here (and too many “useless eaters” on the planet anyway). And 2) He let the cat out of the bag that the Rockefellers were behind (bankrolled) the feminist movement. Why? So that more of the citizenry would get into the work force, and thus pay more tax monies into the federal treasury, so that TPTB could have more money to play with, and steal.

I personally think that David R. saw himself as a ‘David’ mentioned in the Bible (Old Testament) who would come and become king. And this was after the David of biblical notoriety. I wonder if, at 101, he has decided that his day has passed. I wouldn’t put it beyond him to think that he can still rule the world. And so we still need to be on our guard against megalomania. Beyond just that of the Usurper…

1c) from ‘If Clinton Is Elected, Putin Will Start WW III by Attacking America at This Location’ - Dave Hodges - September 9/10
(Alaska.  With Russian troops already there.
Do I believe Putin would do that?  Only if Clinton ‘wins’ the election.)

Stan September 11, 2016 at 1:40 am
(Your comment is awaiting moderation.) 

Thanks for this heads-up, Dave.

We really need to get the Usurper out of there.


Just for your readers’ info: A ‘natural born’ citizen – one of the eligibility requirements for the office of the presidency – is a person born in the country (the legal terminology is jus soli, ‘law of the soil)’ of parents who are citizens thereof (jus sanguinis, ‘law of the blood’). (That’s what makes it ‘natural,’ for heaven’s sake.) The definition is from the definitive tome of the day on such matters, E. de Vattel’s ‘The Law of Nations, Or Principles of Natural Law’ (Book One, Ch. XIX, Sec. 212). And that eligibility requirement for that particular office STILL STANDS, absent a constitutional amendment to the contrary. (A good source of info in depth on this subject: puzo1dotblogspotdotcom.)

So, an arrest of Obama by Oath Keepers would be totally legal, and correct. The coup d’etat has already taken place, by the New World Order gang, in putting the Usurper in that position of such power. Correcting that illegal act would be the reaction to a revolution; not the revolution itself.

No comments: