Monday, 5 September 2016

On Hitting Someone When They Are Down...Gently

from ‘Hillary the Drunk Cannot Be Allowed to be President’ - Dave Hodges - September 3/4
(Hodges reports that in 2008, Hillary was admitted to a treatment facility for alcoholism, according to Psychology Today.
In an accompanying video, Ben Still reports that a good, solid source at CBS has been told by a Clinton staffer that, with the FBI reports coming out, and her poll numbers sagging, possibly leading to her dropping out of the race, a number of her staff are looking to jump ship, and go look for other Dem candidates to go work for; a good staffer being able to make good money even for two months.
The pieces are stacking up against her.)

Stan September 4, 2016 at 11:04 pm (September 5 at 12:04 am PST)
(Your comment is awaiting moderation. )

Before Hillary disappears from the picture, with her criminality, on a number of charges, catching up with her (one can hope), I would love to have her come by my household. I have a sauerkraut jar that I just can’t get the lid off of. The pickle jars I can handle, but this one has me beat. I wonder if she would be willing to give it a shot. To prove…whatever. That she can do it without losing her concentration in the middle of the effort? Or whatever.

Go, Hillary! Just Go.


Do I really think this will happen?

What I think will happen is that TPTB, sensing trouble with Trump ascending, and Hillary tanking particularly because of the FBI/email leaks, will make their move, with a martial law-creating emergency.

 I can only hope, and trust, that enough good, solid souls have donned their White Hats to counter this move.  And help us make the jump to a new, higher level of reality.

That is just waiting to happen anyway, as we speak.


...And speaking of dodgy presidential candidates; and still the world's champion:

from Tea Party C.C.: ‘Judge Rules Government Can Ban Vegetable Gardens Because They’re “Ugly”’ - posted by Marilyn Calkins -September 2; posted here September 4 
Permalink Reply by Andrew Endres 15 hours ago (September 4)


  • Reply
Permalink Reply by Stan Stanfield just now (September 5)

It's a shame that these legal or political entities are so unconversant with the Constitution that they would even think that impeachment was the antidote for what ails us, in the occupancy of BHO of the presidential office.  The man is a Usurper, and needs merely to be arrested, and held for trial (on a whole host of charges by now, including fraud, perjury, and treason).

The law on the matter is very clear, to anybody who can read English with even a modicum of comprehension.  The Constitution requires a person running for the office of the presidency to be, among other eligibility requirements, a "natural born" citizen.  What did that mean to the constitutional Framers?  It is a very simple matter to find that out: the historical record is very clear on the subject, that their understanding of the definition was of a person born a) on the soil, and b) of parents who were citizens thereof.   (That's what makes it 'natural,' for heaven's sake.)  The definition is from the definitive tome of the day on such subjects, E. de Vattel's 'The Law of Nations, Or Principles of Natural Law'.  That requirement, of the occupant of that particular office needing to be more than just a citizen, was put in place primarily because the occupant of that office is also the Commander in Chief of the nation's military forces.  The Framers didn't want anybody occupying that position who had ANY DUAL OR OTHERWISE CONFLICTING LOYALTIES OR ALLEGIANCES OR INFLUENCES.  Had SOLE ALLEGIANCE to the U.S.  And that eligibility requirement for that office STILL STANDS, absent a constitutional amendment to the contrary. 

The American people have made a terrible mistake in trusting their lawyers to advise them of legal matters, should have understood their Constitution better.  There is still time to correct this terrible error.  But barely.

No comments: