I have now come across a couple of examples of what is shaping up to be the last stand of the enemy in regards to the truth, and Truth, about the illegality of Barack Obama Jr. in and for the presidential office. Some background first.
When I first started out on my quest for the truth of this matter, I observed, on the Internet, that the position of the enemy of truth, and Truth, seemed to focus on the red herring of 'the birth certificate,' as if where the Usurper had actually been born was the only factor involved in the question of his ineligibility or lack thereof. And the supporters of the truth of the matter, by and large, unfortunately bought in to that ploy. The fact that the Usurper fell at the hurdle of his (claimed) parentage - the issue of 'jus sanguinis' (law of the blood) which made the issue of 'jus soli' (law of the soil) superfluous - somehow got swept under the carpet. Big mistake, on the part of the citizenry. Compounded by their obvious belief - again, by and large - that if there were anything to the continuing questions being raised about Obama's eligibility, for not being a 'natural born' citizen, that the Republican Party would have made it an issue. Bigger mistake; including, as it did, and does, a) the failure on the part of the citizenry - as self-responsible sovereigns under the American form of government - to understand their own Constitution on such substantive matters, and b) their continued belief in the MSM to bring important matters of fact and substance to their attention. Oh - and c) their failure to understand that both major political parties are, at their tops, but part of a single operation: the hijacking of the United States into a totalitarian, and malevolent, New World Order, run by their masters born to the position. But to continue.
When ridiculing 'birthers' didn't stop the continued questioning on the matter, the enemy resorted to the position of claiming that there are only two kinds of citizens, naturalized or natural born; and the 'fact' that his (purported) mother was an American citizen made him a citizen, and therefore - hey presto! - eligible. The additional fact that his (purported) mother was not of sufficient an age to automatically confer her citizenship to her child never got much traction in the 'debate'. And there was a failure on the part of 'Truthers'1 to get much traction, in the attention span of the citizenry-at-large, to question this basic assertion. Which could have been shot down earlier than it has been, if enough of the citizenry had been alerted - been open to being alerted - to the telling fact that Alexander Hamilton, as a delegate to the Constitutional Convention proceedings, made a proposal there that the president need only be, quote, "born a Citizen" - and his proposal was SPECIFICALLY TURNED DOWN, in favor of the more stringent 'natural born' category of citizen. But to move on.
The next line of defense of the enemies of the truth of this matter and Truth in general was to claim that the Naturalization Act of 1790 settled the matter, and it was time for the racists to move on from their deceitful maneuvers, trying to thwart the will of the people, etc. etc. etc. in that line of deceitful garbage.2 Willfully failing to alert the citizenry to the fact that that Act was repealed by the Naturalization Act of 1795 ON THIS VERY ISSUE - for its having been misleading in its reference to a nbc. With both Madison (in Congress at the time) and Washington (as president at the time) signing off on that repeal.
So, under cross-examination, as it were, the position of the enemies of the truth of the matter and Truth in general has been eroded under their feet.3 So, what have they now done? No quitters, these - too much is at stake, for them to give up their Grand Design now, just when their goal is in sight; of a defeated U.S.A., 'transformed' into a submissive entity to their best-laid plans. What 'they' are doing now - what they have been forced to resort to, now - is to simply demonize the Constitution itself.
The position of these couple of responses to my comments on this issue on various Comments threads to Internet articles has been as follows (and I paraphrase):
'Oh, well, the Constitution, oh, well, that piece of trash. Born of slave owners, doncha know, and people who treated the Native American Indians so terribly, the natives to this land, whose land it was, and all those white European settlers came in and brutalized them, took their land away from them, and the slavery that went on here and all, brutalizing the blacks, why should we pay any attention to their damn piece of paper, harrumph harrumph.'
Er - excuse me, sir. Your lesson in sociology aside: What does this sort of defense have to do with the issue at hand? Which is the law of the land, in the form of the Constitution of the United States of America; and thus, we are talking about the rule of law, rather than the rule of men. The latter otherwise known as tyranny. What say you to that issue, sir?
'Oh, well, the Constitution, oh, well, that piece of trash; well - we've got an answer to that, too.'
And what is that, sir?
'Well, don't tell anybody; but we're going to break down the United States, under the guise of a declaration of martial law, and our man in the Oval Office will -
' - what am I saying??!'
You are saying The Truth, sir. Because
the Truth will out.
And hopefully in time. For The People to do their thing.
Rise to this occasion.
This Completion occasion.
For the lessons to have been learned thereby, and therefrom.
One of which is that
the Light wins.
In the end.
Because the Light simply, by its very nature, IS. Whereas the Dark depends on the Light for its very being.
So, get on the Right side of this scenario, people.
Your future development depends on it.
And as for you, on the side of the Dark:
You will be given an opportunity to come over to the side of the Light.
Which includes your extermination, as a soul, if you continue to refuse to acknowledge your essential nature,continue to stay stuck in the Creation, causing as much mischief as you can. Out of spit; or for whatever reason.
An addiction to Power, most probably.
Which ironically will be
As an enemy - an unreconstructed, irredeemable enemy - of
Which is how serious this seemingly little matter of a seemingly little 'truth' is.
P.S. And who decides that you are irredeemable?
Your Creator is ever forgiving. That is why I say - and continue to point out, unceasingly - that it is, all,
1 Already a demonized species, with questioners of the official version of 9/11 being thus labeled and ridiculed.
Nice to see them beginning to have their proper day in the sun...
2 This line of defense was adopted when the case of Ted Cruz came up to be looked at. He was born in Canada, of a mother who could well have given up her American citizenship in order to become eligible for certain Canadian benefits anyway, and of a foreign-citizen father. TPTB have tried to sell his eligibility on the 'strength' of this Act. Which should have been ruled out at the outset anyway, because Acts of Congress, or Resolutions, or Declarations, or even Supreme Court decisions DO NOT TRUMP THE CONSTITUTION ITSELF Only a constitutional amendment trumps the Constitution. Or a properly-created treaty.
But to continue.
3 Including as well 'their' argument that the constitutional Framers were going by English Common Law at the time. Which - unfortunately for them, and their perverted desire to water down this eligibility requirement to the point of its disappearing - talks about 'natural born SUBJECTS'. Which those men certainly were not any longer; having been through a long and bloody War of Independence to become freemen - sovereigns in their own right. No; they were 'citizens,' not 'subjects' - and damn proud of it. They were clearly going by American Common Law, or Natural Law. As codified in the definitive tome of the day on such matters (which Benjamin Franklin, the Framers's elder and respected mentor and a delegate to those self-same proceedings himself, was known to have 3 copies of; and which was taught in the universities of the day AS WELL), E. de Vattel's 'The Law Of Nations' (sometimes subtitled 'Principles of Natural Law'). (See: Book One, CH. XIX, Sect. 212.)
But to continue.
P.S. And speaking of the United States, and its continued development. Or not:
from teapartyorg.ning.com: ’Supreme Court Devastates Dems With Blunt Ruling on Voter Fraud’ - posted by Marilyn Calkins - September 21 (orig. posted at conservativetribune.com - September 15)
Reply by Stan Stanfield just now (September 21)
Good, but not enough. We need a CLEAN SWEEP of voter fraud. Patriotic citizens in every state - Republican AND Democrat - need to agitate for:
certifiably cleansed voter reg rolls, of all ineligible voters, dead voters, and duplicate voters; no Early Voting or Absentee Ballot Voting until such a certifiably cleansed process has taken place; mandatory photo ID (which a person needs even to cash a welfare check); a receipt confirming one's vote; and especially: NO MORE ELECTRONIC VOTING MACHINES - back to paper ballots, and a clear paper trail. The machines have been proven to be hackable in a number of ways.
We need to get serious about this matter. Every citizen should be able to feel that their vote is not being canceled out by illegality. And go to dipping a voter's finger in purple ink if we have to, to CLEAN OUT THE CORRUPTION. The way things are is reprehensible, should never have been allowed to get this bad.
Freedom is not free.
But then, that election may not be held anyway.
For a number of reasons.
Including one from the side of the Light.
Which signals that it is time for something new, that is true.
Just not the best-laid plan of the Dark side, is all. Because it is not, really, their time.
It is the Time of our Creator Source.
Who created the time - and Time - in the first place, anyway.