Monday, 26 December 2016

Boxing Day

Round One:

from ‘’Fake’ Obama Birth Certificate Was ’Inside Job’’ - Bob Unruh - December 25
(Reporting on the Arpaio-Zullo press conference.  “
The chief investigator for Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s probe of the validity of the image Barack Obama released as his birth certificate says evidence suggests the involvement of the Hawaiian government in the alleged fabrication."  Which implicates the White House in the crime.  I'll go into this particular point in the second posting below, the next day.  First things first.)  

I'm not really sure there's much of a point to all this "birtherism." Even if he was born in Kenya, so what?

BTW, this whole "birther" controversy got started by Hillary Clinton's campaign in 2008. A New York Jew and Democrat Phillip Berg started this whole nonsense.


  •          kibitzer3 mark hauser a few seconds ago (December 25)

    • "So what?" So, Mark, the man is an imposter, guilty at the least of fraud and perjury. And since (else why fake his BC) he was not "born in the country, of parents who are citizens" - the definition of the 'natural born citizen' term that there is considerable historical evidence was the definition at the time that the constitutional Framers put that eligibility requirement in their contract for that particular office; and which requirement STILL STANDS, absent a constitutional amendment to the contrary - there are considerable consequences to his illegal occupancy of that office.

    • Among which are the grossly disturbing facts that all of the legislation that the Usurper has signed into law, and all of the E.O.'s and P.D.'s that he has issued, and all of the appointments that he has made - including to the SCOTUS, and inferior courts - go with him, into the trash bin. For it to be as though he had never been there. Because he has never been there legally.

    • That's "so what," Mark.

    • Now, if it turns out that he actually IS a 'natural born citizen' - since, with his BC having been proven a forgery, we don't really know WHO his parents were, or where he was born - I suppose he could plead for mercy. As in the classic definition of 'chutzpah' - that being of the actions of a young man who kills both of his parents and then pleads for mercy on the grounds that he is an orphan. And Obama - or whatever his real name is - has certainly shown us that he has plenty of the audacity required for such a plea.

    • The Audacity of Hope, indeed.

But this ins't really what I want to talk about, on this (just-gone) 'day after'.  I would rather just leave a simple message; forgetting all the distinctions between what is 'real - e.g., the pagan origins of various 'holidays' in our lives - and what is 'not real'.  When, after all, the whole thing of 'life' is not 'real'.  But rather, a school.

Try this on for reality:

We grow up - to a certain extent - and leave the home of our parents, go out into 'the world' to explore, and find the pearl of great price, which is your true identity, and thus return - as though for the first time - to your Source, as individuality making its way to Unity. Not as in 'back'.  But as in graduation.

May you succeed, each in, and on, your personal journey.


Round Two - 'Murkier and Murkier The Further Down the Rabbit Hole We Go'

from ‘Investigator: Hawaii Neve Verified Obama Birth-Certificate Image’ - Bob Unruh - December 26
(Essentially the same article as yesterday, only highlighting this particular angle.  But unfortunately, muddying the waters a bit in doing so.  
The question is what precisely the Hawaiian authority was referring to when he/she verified that the “information” posted on the web site “matches the information contained in the original certification of live birth,,,on file with the state of Hawaii Department of Health”.  Lead investigator Mike Zullo is reported in the article as saying: “I don’t believe that the document (Obama’s) counsel picked up looked anything like what’s displayed at”  But the real issue is the fact that the Hawaiian authorities could have “amended” Obama’s bc - “which is legal,” Zullo adds - but then hid the fact that it was an amended form, and could have buried the actual original document on file - if there even ever was one.  So the real question is not if there was a change made between what the Hawaiian authorities gave Obama’s counsel and what was put on the WH web site (the Hawaiian authority has said that the information there “matches” the original “on file”), and thus implicating the WH gang in the matter; it is if any changes had been made in the actual form on current file in Hawaii to start with.
But that’s not the point that I chose to address in my comment below.  I will stay with the real, main issue in this whole mess of a matter.  
The matter, of Wither Thou Goest, America.  And how thou goest there.)
Bondservant an hour ago December 16)

Congress will do nothing. It is just impossible to invalidate every thing that he has signed with the blessing of Congress during the past 7 years and 11months.


  •           kibitzer3 Bondservant a few seconds ago (December 26)

    • No it isn't. It is never too late for Truth to prevail. And in this case, Truth will nullify a) all of the legislation that the Usurper has signed into law, b) all of the E.O.'s and P.D.'s that he has issued, and c) all of the appointments that he has made, including to to the SCOTUS, and inferior courts. It needs to be as though he had never been there; for he has never been there legally.

    • Too many people today seem to have a strange attitude about living with untruth. Especially as big an untruth as an ineligible presidential candidate trying to get away with being in that terribly important and powerful office, and wrecking the country as a consequence. We need to learn the full consequences of this outrageous action. As painful as that lesson may be. The future of the U.S.A. demands no less. Or the rule of law - the Constitution - is over and done with. And the rule of men to prevail. Another word for which is arbitrary law. Another word for which is tyranny.

    • Wake up, America. And rise to this occasion. Or you have doomed your country to a hellish outcome. Far worse than that of attempting to let the matter go, for the sake of some temporary peace and quiet. How shortsighted can people be, who would opt for the latter choice.

No comments: