On Setting Things To Rights

My computer

Had become infected

Terribly.

It took some doing

To set it right.

As it will

The government.

        I

The president

Of the United States

           must be

A “natural born”

Citizen.

            I.e., 

           one born

On the soil

Of two - that’s two -

U.S. citizen parents.

It could not be

Otherwise.

   The whole point

Of the exercise

    on the part

Of the constitutional

       Framers

(A distinguished lot

    if there ever

    was one)

In putting that 

     eligibility

Requirement in

Their constitutional

    contract

For that particular

Office - and that

Particular office

Only, one must

Understand, to get

     the picture

     fully -

Was to make sure -

At least insofar

As they could,

In their time -

That the office

Of the president

Of the new

Federal

Constitutional

Republic

For its citizenry

And for the world

As like a shining city

On a hill

Did not devolve to

              anyone

With any foreign

Allegiance.

               To say,

To a naturalized

Citizen.  Or -

          wait for

          it -

          to a dual

Citizen.

Like Obama.

Duh.

-

Show me

The constitutional

Amendment that 

Changes that requirement

And that intention.

           Otherwise,

           all those

Who have been involved

In this act

Of chicanery

And deceit

Go to prison.

And that includes

All those Congressmen

And -women

Who have failed

In their duty - 

                  their 

      constitutional

      duty (to say,

               under

      the rule of law) -

Of responsibility

In this

Meretricious -

               even

       malevolent -

Matter.

       II

I was angered

By the first occasion

Of to-rights setting

Mentioned herein.

But it is as nothing

Compared to 

The other.

Beware.

Because - you see - 

We cannot progress

From here

      to where

      we

      are going

Without Truth

As our lodestone.

Embody it.

       Or be

      left

    behind.

---

2) from TeaPartyC.C.: ‘Legal duo says Cruz eligible to seek presidency’ - posted by Natl Dir Dee - March 13 (orig. posted at yahoo.com - Philip Elliott - Mar. 13)

..

Permalink Reply by Stan Stanfield 1 second ago (Mar. 14)

'An American' is spot on on this matter, and those two shyster lawyers can go to warmer climes.  (It's obvious that both the Democrat AND the Republican Parties are in on this scam, or we wouldn't BE in this terrible predicament.)

It is actually not rocket science.  The whole POINT of that eligibility requirement set by the constitutional Framers for that [particular] office - and that [particular] federal office ONLY, a not-incidental, rather extremely significant, factor - was so that the candidate, if elected - who would as well then become the Commander in Chief of the nation's military forces - would have no DUAL/CONFLICTING LOYALTIES OR ALLEGIANCES.  Like a naturalized citizen would be subject to.  And ESPECIALLY like a DUAL citizen would be subject to.  Like Obama.  And like Cruz.  (And Rubio.  And Jindal.)  And once not a 'natural born' citizen, ALWAYS not a 'natural born' citizen.

These legal beagles are trying to play a magician's trick on us: 'Watch this hand.  See: 'born abroad,' no big deal; watch while I deal with it.'  'But what about not having had two U.S. citizen parents?' -'No no; watch THIS hand.  The 'where born' hand. Stop looking at the other hand...'

On the other hand, John Jay, a respected statesman of the day (and who, not so incidentally, became the first Chief Justice of the new U.S. Supreme Court), wrote a letter to G. Washington, in his role as Chair of the Constitutional Convention proceedings, to "hint" at the need for the potential Commander in Chief of the nation's military forces to be a "natural born citizen" - i.e., one with NO FOREIGN ALLEGIANCES.  And to top off the historical case: Alexander Hamilton made a proposal at the Convention that the president need only be a "citizen" - and his proposal was specifically TURNED DOWN. 

This is NOT a minor matter.  This is a major constitutional crisis in this country.  One that could potentially dissolve both major political parties, for being involved in RICO-Statute conspiracy activities, for obviously having colluded in this crime, against the very rule of law in this country - i.e., the Constitution.  And seeing them both go down wouldn't be a bad idea, anyway, for all the corruption that they have both been up to.  For long enough, now.

So maybe this is a blessing in disguise.  And we can, at the end of the dark days, thank Obama and those two political parties for helping us 'see the light'.  And go for it.