from Tea Party C.C.: 'The fascist state of America' - posted by Asst Natl Dir Melony B. DeFord - Mar. 2 (orig. posted at personal liberty.com - by Bob Livingston - Mar. 2)
("There comes a time in the course of human events that it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands that have connected them with another. America is fast hurtling toward that time.
"The United States was founded on the republican principles of federalism (states’ rights) and representative government. Today’s government is “constitutional” in name only.
"The undocumented usurper currently despoiling the peoples’ house has for six years shown utter disdain for the founding document. In a town hall meeting on Wednesday last, Barack Obama bragged that he has expanded his authorities “under executive action and prosecutorial discretion.”
"But Article III of the Constitution lays out the chief executive’s authorities quite explicitly. There is no room for “expanding” them within the scope of the Constitution…")
..
Permalink Reply by Samuel M. Smith 10 hours ago (Mar. 2)
We see that our already DeFacto Dictator has utter contempt for the rule of law and our Constitution. The absolute CRIMINAL GALL of him to DARE challenge BOTH HOUSES of Congress to override HIS ILLEGAL Executive Orders! He thinks he is King George - er -Hussein.
In the statement he made at the TownHall meeting shown on MSNBC, he essentially DECLARED WAR ON THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. BY DOING SO, HE IS CLEARLY GUILTY OF TREASON and is CLEARLY AN ENEMY OF THE UNITED STATES even though he occupies the White House belonging to We the People.
EVERY COMMISSIONED OFFICER IN THE UNITED STATED MILITARY IS SWORN TO PROTECT AND DEFEND THE UNITED STATES AGAINST ALL ENEMIES, FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC. WHEN WILL SOME TOP GENERAL or ADMIRAL OBEY HIS OVERRIDING ORDER, based on his Oath of Commission AND COMMAND a large enough military operation to Arrest of ALL TRAITORS who obey Obama instead of the real LAWFUL Constitutional government as they were also sworn to do?
I can see the problem. Our Founding Fathers never dreamed that someone with such a hatred and scorn for the Rule of Law would ever be elected to the Presidency. They would never have believed a majority of voters could be so fooled by an IMPOSTER like Obama. They could not imagine a President who would OPENLY DEFY Congress and ignore Supreme Court Rulings that have ALREADY DECLARED many of his Executive Orders UnConstitutional. Based on Obama's declaration at the broadcast Town Hall meeting, he feels that he has the power to VETO the Articles of Impeachment if Congress were to pass them. Likewise, if the several Supreme Court and lesser court cases against him and his Executive Orders succeed 100 percent, who has the GUTS to enforce the court decisions. There have already been several and nobody seems to be lifting a finger to enforce those rulings.
My neck is already on the Obama chopping block, I believe, if he is ALLOWED the time and opportunity to order Martial Law. We know he has an Executive Order in place that would allow him to do just that.
Following the methodology of the early 1920's Soviet Union, anyone who even might THINK of opposing the Dictator or his party were either sent to a Siberian Gulag [here, a FEMA Camp] or shot on the spot. This Dictator seems more likely to use mass beheadings.
Can someone please help someone in COMMAND AUTHORITY to get the backbone to order a large enough force to overcome obstacles and ARREST and Imprison the IMPOSTER, TRAITOR and de facto Dictator before he wages a bloodbath against patriotic citizens of the United States like you and me?
▶ Reply
Permalink Reply by Stan Stanfield 1 hour ago (Mar. 3)
Well put, Samuel. However, I would point out that actions have consequences, and We the People allowed an ineligible candidate to run for, and win, the presidency; thus we are as responsible for the whirlwind that we have sown as that bag of wind currently occupying the Oval Office.
It should have been clear, to any generation that studied and understood its national Constitution: one of the requirements for the top office in the land - and that particular office ONLY - was that the person needed to be a "natural born citizen"; not just any kind of citizen. What would that term mean? As I say: it should have been obvious. The whole point of the constitutional Framers putting that requirement into their contract with the new federal government that they were creating was so that the presidential candidate, if elected - who would as well then become the Commander in Chief of the nation's military forces; a particular concern of these revolutionaries, who had just fought and won a War of Independence from foreign domination - would have no DUAL/CONFLICTING LOYALTIES OR ALLEGIANCES. Like a naturalized citizen would be subject to. And like a DUAL citizen would be subject to. Like Obama.
DUH. (A 'natural born' citizen, then, being one born on the soil of two U.S. citizen parents. As its classic definition has it to be. The requirement changeable by constitutional amendment.)
So we have been saddled with the consequences of our mistake, as a self-governing citizenry, of going to sleep, and leaving the running of the country up to our elected representatives; who would become susceptible to all manner of temptations in such a position of power. So, in pointing a finger at them, notice the number of your fingers pointing back at you.
So, what do we do now?
Correct our error. Remove the Usurper in power, from his position OF power, owning some of the responsibility for the mess that we helped create. And make sure that we learn our lesson. Or that sort of lesson will be visited upon us yet once again. And again. Until we get it right: that
actions have consequences.
No comments:
Post a Comment