Sunday 17 July 2016

On Making Mistakes


from wearechange.org: ‘Executive Order: United Nations allowed to use Force on US Citizens’ - Danny F. Quest - July 13; posted July 17

..
Snufy 13 minutes ago (July 17)

Is it possible for the sheeple to wake up to their stupidity of voting for someone who has been raised in a communist environment and is an illegal citizen, himself? You will awaken to reality with your hands tied behind your backs and your head in a guilitine.

2
Reply

  • kibitzer3 Snufy a few seconds ago (July 17)

  • Indeed, Snufy. We are simply finding out the 'law' of consequences of actions, for having gone asleep to our responsibilities in this country as a self-governing people, and instead, trusting the professional political class to look out for our interests. They have been looking out for the interests of their financial masters. A true nation of sovereigns would have understood their Constitution better, and realized from the outset that Obama was ineligible for that office, for not being a 'natural born' citizen. Which any decent check of the historical record would have alerted the public to the fact that the definition of such a category of citizen is a person born in the country of citizen parents thereof - and which eligibility requirement for that particular federal office STILL STANDS, absent a constitutional amendment to the contrary.

  • Marry in haste, repent at leisure.
..

If I had to put my life in the hands of either radical white supremacists, or U.N. forces sent in to deal with a right wing insurrection, I'll put my faith in the hands of people other than the right wing posters here. I don't trust them.


Reply

  • kibitzer3
    Eric H. Granberg a few seconds ago (July 17)

  • I'm not precisely sure what you mean by a "right wing insurrection," Eric.  But if you mean a reaction of patriots to the attempted overthrow of their country by totalitarians, then count me among your enemies.
--

Be more precise in your words and terms, Eric & Co.  Otherwise, you are playing a game.  It's like the slow, incremental change from 'terrorist' to patriots and constitutionalists, and veterans and Second Amendment supporters and Christians, being placed in the category of 'potential domestic terrorists'.  Potential domestic terrorists to whom?  Only to people who are trying to slowly slowly take over the country, to make it over into a mere part of a region of their long-planned totalitarian New World Order.

Wouldn't have anything to do with 'The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion,' would it, Eric Granberg???

I have said it before, 
                       and I
Will say it again: 
Get thee behind me, 
Satan. 


See henrymakow.com on entries in the Protocols regarding 'terrorism' as a tool and technique for takeover, by our erstwhile masters.

The Protocols, far from being - as they are pretended to be, by, shall we say, 'vested interests' - a forgery of the Russian czars, are a precise and detailed outline for Jewish takeover and domination, by those who think of themselves as The Chosen People.  It is a conceit that has gotten them into trouble in, and kicked out of, country after country throughout history, as they attempted to connive their way into influence, and final takeover.  

Such is the power of ideas.  False.  Or real.

Anyway:

Keep Hillary 'Rodham' (check out her real family name) Clinton as far away from the levers of power in this country as possible.  She is a serial criminal, with obscene ambitions, and unholy intentions. 


P.S. 'Rightwing extremism' was targeted as early as April 2009, in a DHS pamphlet.   Starting in right from the git-go, eh, Barry???

As to this latter point (and to keep the flow in its context):





If I had to put my life in the hands of either radical white supremacists, or U.N. forces sent in to deal with a right wing insurrection, I'll put my faith in the hands of people other than the right wing posters here. I don't trust them.







    • I'm not precisely sure what you mean by a "right wing insurrection," Eric. But if you mean a reaction of patriots to the attempted overthrow of their country by totalitarians, then count me among your enemies.







        • Do you consider yourself a white supremacist? If white supremacists tried to take over America while Barack Obama was President, and the U.N.sent in troops to help us defend our government (i.e. defend America), would you be out there with me defending America, or would you be part of the insurrection.







      • There is a basic confusion here. Obama is occupying that office illegally, for not being a 'natural born' citizen (a subject I won't go into here in its detail). He has been gearing up for a takeover of the country from the git-go, when his DHS honcho issued a pamphlet in early 2009 naming 'rightwing extremism' as an enemy to prepare for. And subsequently his enemies list extended to "patriots, Constitutionalists, Second Amendment supporters, veterans, Christians..." It is obvious what has been going on, to those who have eyes to see. Especially when the Usurper has begun not only to arm his executive-branch agencies with military-style weaponry but to slip UN troops into the country, positioning them for when he needs to call on them, to help bail him out from his attempted overthrow of the nation.
        The U.N. sending in troops "to help us defend our government (i.e. defend America)"??? I will absolutely be out there "defending America" from its attempted overthrow, Eric. The real question is, which side are YOU on.


        • Eric H. Granberg kibitzer3 15 minutes ago (July 18)
        • You have a basic misunderstanding of the truth. I'll be on the side defending America, perhaps with some help. Apparently you will be on the side staging a coup.
        • Reply


        • kibitzer3
          Eric H. Granberg a few seconds ago (July 18)

        • The coup has already taken place. That was when both political parties conspired to let the Usurper slip into the Oval Office and start the process for the New World Order in earnest.  I will be on the side of those who will be returning the U.S.A. to its rule of law - the Constitution. The rule of men - aka arbitrary law; aka tyranny - will have had its day in the sun. Back into the shadows it will go. Always a threat. To keep us on guard. Freedom not being free.


      No comments: