Friday, 20 November 2015

On Getting To Nova Earth

So.  Here we are.  At last.  At long last.  

On the verge of The New.  But before we can move further into that New - to be built on Truth, and Justice, and Love - I feel the need to address a couple of issues in particular, to the American people; to clean and clear up the Old, before we leave it behind, for good.  Literally.   

Though actually, it’s one issue, with two examples in particular.  The issue is Truth, with both a small t and a capital t.  And the examples are both to do with your - our - Constitution.

You seem to have fallen down on the job, and terribly, of being a self-governing people.  America was set up on one purpose in particular  The other main purpose was to live in, and by, essential liberty.  The liberty - the freedom - of the individual, over the power of the state, ultimately for the state to run one’s life to within an inch of that life; and thereby depriving us ‘spiritual beings having a human experience’ of the fair exercise of our God-granted free will.  In order to grow in consciousness thereby, into our full potential.  As gods in the making.  But to address the other main purpose for now.

And that purpose was to demonstrate to the world the value, and ability, of a people to be their own sovereign.  Not to need anyone else - be it royal, or Church, or despot, or oligarchy - to do it for them.  To take on that responsibility to, and for, themselves.

And that meant, to pay attention - close attention - to your rule of law.  That it did not deteriorate into the rule of men.  A/k/a arbitrary law.  Which is the hallmark of tyrants down through the ages.   Or had you not noticed, from this planet’s long history in such regards.

What am I talking about.  I am talking about your failure - by and large - to note two things in particular regarding your Constitution.  Your rule of law.  

I have really had a hard time understanding why you, my people, had, seemingly, such a hard time understanding the meaning of two terms in your Constitution in particular.  Some others seem to have evaded your grasp as well; but two in particular stand out, for me at least.  

One is the meaning of the term, a “natural born citizen” in regards to the eligibility requirements for a person to hold the office of the presidency of the United States.  And the other is the term, and meaning, of the phrase “and subject to the jurisdiction thereof” in your 14th Amendment.    

First things first.  The term, and meaning of, a ‘natural born’ citizen; as opposed, logically, to any other kinds of citizenship. 

What did one have to do to find out what the constitutional Framers meant, a) by that term, and b) by putting it in their requirements for that particular office?  For it does not appear in the Constitution - your rule of law - in the denoted eligibility requirements for any other federal office.  So, there must have been some good reason for that requirement to be set in that stone - unless subsequently amended, by the amending process allowed for, by the Framers, for their governing contract, for the new nation - ‘Conceived in liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that’ a subsequent president, Abraham Lincoln, referred to so eloquently, in his Gettysburg Address.  

But back to the point at hand.  Where I was asking, What would it have taken, for a self-governing individual to find out what the constitutional Framers meant, a) by that term, and b) by putting it in their eligibility requirements for that particular office, and that particular office only?  Why, all one would have had to do was go to the historical record, to find out what that was all about.  

That; or trust your political professionals to keep you informed.  But you were not supposed to have a professional political class, lording it over you, their being responsible for such things.  You were supposed to be your own leaders.  But to move on. 

So; going to the historical record, to find out what that requirement was all about. And what that was all about was making sure that the holder of that office - the occupant of the Oval Office, holding that power, and responsibility - had SOLE ALLEGIANCE to the United States.


For, the definition of a ‘natural born’ citizen, and the one that the constitutional Framers were clearly going by, is one born on the soil of citizen parents.  That’s PLURAL.  As in BOTH.  

The definition was clearly codified in the definitive tome on such matters of the day, Emer de Vattel’s ‘The Law of Nations Or Principles of Natural Law’.

You may have heard of the expression, ‘Natural Law’.  It is referred to a number of times in this nation’s founding documents.  The constitutional Framers, and other Founding Fathers of this nation, were clearly familiar with the de Vattel treatise.  And if any of the delegates to the Constitutional Convention was NOT familiar with the term, all he would have had to do was ask their respected elder mentor, one Benjamin Franklin - sitting right there amongst them as a delegate to the very same proceedings - who was conversant with such things - and, it is known, had three copies of de Vattel’s treatise; and furthermore, had made it available to members of the Continental Congress, which he was also a member of, at that time, of the creation of a new nation on Earth.

For a number of good purposes.  But back to our main subject, here.  Which is the meaning of a couple of terms in particular in the Constitution.  

So: The president needing to be a ‘natural born’ citizen.  The constitutional Framers doing all that they could to make sure that the occupant of that office - who would as well, then, become the Commander in Chief of the nation’s military forces; a substantial consideration in this whole scenario - would have NO DUAL OR OTHERWISE CONFLICTING LOYALTIES OR ALLEGIANCES.  As a naturalized citizen would be subject to.  And as a DUAL citizen would MOST CERTAINLY be subject to.

Like anyone that you know of?  Can think of, right offhand??

Incumbent.  Or candidate???…

Now, times change, indeed; and circumstances could change over the course of the centuries, and amendments to the constitutional contract would undoubtedly be entertained, and some legally ratified.  And this subject - this legal eligibility requirement for the office of the presidency - could well be included in those new considerations -

and in point of fact, such an amendment, involving this rather stringent eligibility requirement for the office of the presidency, HAS been entertained.  EIGHT TIMES in the period between 2003 and 2008 ALONE; when BOTH main political parties tried to get an amendment going through Congress including this very subject - and each time failed even to get their proposals out of committee, such was the sensitivity around THIS VERY ISSUE.

And so what did they do?

They did an end-around of the Constitution.  

They colluded, between them, to secretly amend the Constitution on this issue, by pretense.



By between them ignoring the rule of law, and pretending that the term meant and means something other than what it naturally meant, and means to this very day.

Any subsequent court decisions to the contrary being meaningless, on a fundamental constitutional issue. Which requires - as, I say, both major political parties KNEW - an amendment to the contractual document on which we have based our rule of law in this country: the Constitution.

So.  They knew.  And engaged in a criminal conspiracy in an attempt to circumvent the law.  And need to pay for it.  And be dissolved.  For being the criminal enterprises that they have proven to be.  And will be proven, in a legitimate court of law, to have been.

The other main term that I wish to address here, more briefly, is the term “and subject to the jurisdiction thereof” as it appears in the 14th Amendment, regarding citizenship of children.  Which has been ignored, and the amendment used to confer U.S citizenship on children illegally.

The whole sentence in question reads:

“All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside.”

The term is obvious in its meaning - and should have been obvious to even a halfway decent lawyer; with its meaning clearly spelled out in the historical record, by the proponents of the amendment, and on the floor of the Senate itself, no less.  It does NOT include babies born to parents who are in this country either illegally, or otherwise still subject to the jurisdiction of their home countries.

There is no such thing as either an ‘anchor baby’ or a baby born to a tourist in this country being thereby a US. citizen.


All such shyster-lawyer stuff being hereby rendered null and void.

Especially because we are now entering a New World, based above all on Truth.  Justice will apply in mitigating circumstances, as we sort out the messy ramifications of this criminal behavior, on the part of so-called legal experts as well, and SET THINGS RIGHT; in this country, and on the planet at large.  Becoming a very small planet, indeed, with all of its peoples inextricably intertwined, in the move into The New.  Which may well, indeed, entail a relaxing of individual nation-state borders, as we, indeed, become One World.  But the sleaze - the chicanery - the deceit - the fraudulent behavior - is over.   

And that goes with our financial situation as well.  As we move out from under the shadow of what is called the ‘Babylonian magical money system’ as well, and return ‘money’ to its rightful role, as merely a convenient means of exchange; not an end in itself.  And a Jubilee is declared, as the world moves into the Light of its New Day.  As, as I say, One World indeed. Burt under God.  Not under petty despots, who would rule with an iron fist.  Instead of a heart.  And a soul, dedicated to Truth.  And Justice. 

Petty despots.  Ruling by Power Over Others.  Rather than by Power With other aspects of our collective Self.

By rights, you should have to lie in the bed that you made, on all of these issues.  At least for awhile.  In order to get the lesson, fully, as to the consequences of your actions.

But we need, now, to move on.

But, just, saying.  As they say.

And so, now:

I declare the New Earth


And may we make the most of it.

And to end this admonition and declaration on a personal note, and for total clarity's sake:

I am sorely offended by all the untruth - the chicanery and deceit - going on in this county, so deal to my heart.  I look forward to that state of affairs - and all such scurrilous behavior - being rectified.  And our getting on with the Purpose for it all.

Not staying stuck in the process;

of becoming as gods

as unto that which we are a part.

A pierce of that content, a part of that main, as the poet characterized our nature.

Our better nature.

Now being asked to come to the fore


No comments: