Wednesday, 4 November 2015

On Reading Comprehension in America

from ’Senator Ted Cruz Was The First Hispanic To Clerk For A Chief Justice Of The United States Supreme Court (4 of 5)’ - November 2

ARETHEYNUTS 19 hours ago (November 3)

I'm all in with Ted Cruz. I knew from the first time I Heard him speak he was the one


           kibitzer3 ARETHEYNUTS 18 hours ago (November 3)
  • A good man, yes. He makes a very good senator. And since he is not a 'natural born' citizen - as others have noted back at the beginning of this series of stories - he is ineligible for the office of POTUS; and so should stay there, to do his good work there.

  • Better, he should come out as the ineligible candidate that he is, and why, and thus smoke the Usurper out of the Oval Office, in a cleansing of the executive branch of this country. Before it's too late.
  • Reply
      • ARETHEYNUTS kibitzer3 6 hours ago (November 4)

      • I'm sorry but that is not true, he IS A NATURAL born Citizen, his mother is an Ametican and she was old enough to give her nationality to him. Read US code 1401

    •           1
    •           Reply

ourzoo10 kibitzer3 13 hours ago (November 4)

Ted Cruz is eligible to be President, since he was born to a U.S. citizen. The fact he was born in Canada, means he is not 'native' born, but he is Natural Born by blood. 8 U.S. Code 1401

           Myrtle Linder ourzoo10 9 hours ago (November 4)
    • Sigh...Do conservatives have as much lack of reading comprehension as liberals? Or are some of them just PLAYING dumb?? We're not talking about a mere "citizen". The Constitution requires, for the office of the POTUS - and that particular federal office ONLY; for good reason, which I will come to in a minute - that the occupant needs to be a "natural born" citizen. Which is defined, and as at the time of its rendering into the constitutional contract, as being one born on the soil of (in this case, U.S.) citizen parents. That's PLURAL. As in BOTH.

    • The whole POINT of the exercise on the part of the constitutional Framers in putting that particular eligibility requirement in their contract for that particular office was so that the occupant of that office, who would as well then become the Commander in Chief of the nation's military forces, would have NO DUAL/CONFLICTING LOYALTIES OR ALLEGIANCES. As a naturalized citizen would be subject to. And as a DUAL citizen would MOST CERTAINLY be subject to. Like Cruz. And like Obama. And that is why BO is a Usurper in the office, and needs to be removed from the office - arrested, and held for trial on a whole host of charges by now. Including fraud, perjury, and treason.

    • It doesn't MATTER what any administrative code may or may not say to the issue. The only way to get around the 'natural born' requirement would be by a constitutional amendment. And in point of fact, both main political parties tried a total of 8 times between them, between 2003 and '08, to get precisely such a constitutional amendment going through Congress, to water down that strict requirement - and they failed each time even to get their proposals out of committee, such was the sensitivity around the issue. So what did they do? They colluded, in trying to do an end around of the Constitution. Which means that by rights, the authorities of both parties need to be hauled into a - legitimate - court of law, and tried under RICO statutes, for the criminal enterprises that they are - and both parties dissolved for that reason. In the meantime, at the risk of pointing out the obvious: Two wrongs do NOT make a right. Cruz MUST face the facts, and bow out of the race - and thereby, hang BO out to dry, for being the Imposter in that office that he is.

    • So, Cruz could STILL be the hero in this whole messy matter. Messy, including the fact that all the legislation that the Usurper has signed into law, and all the E.O.'s and P.D.'s that he has issued, and all the appointments that he has made (including to the SCOTUS), go with him, into the trash bin. And this nation gets back to the rule of law - the Constitution. Not the rule of men. Aka arbitrary law. Which is the hallmark of tyrants down through the ages.

    • Not in my country, you won't.


The number that the socialists have pulled on the educational systems in this country -  admittedly with the help of their fascist counterparts over on the far Right; collectivists all - is atrocious.  Reading comprehension is just part of it.  There's the New Math; which is designed to screw up our kids's minds, and make them not want to pursue such subjects, thus dumbing down the country, in order to meld it into the collectivists' desired New World Order.  And there is this business of their having withdrawn the teaching of spelling; which is so obvious in the illiterate postings on the Internet that it is almost laughable.*   

But spelling changes over time anyway?  But in the meantime, there is the little natter of training our children's minds to look at the detail of things.  And to appreciate the detail of things.  And the difference in meaning that the details can bring.  As in the differences, say, between their, there, and they're.

And as in the difference between a born citizen and a natural born citizen...

I won't belabor the point  Let me close this particular blog with the comment, and observation, that:

Your attitude towards Truth - the Truth of things; as opposed to the expedience of things  - leaves something to be desired, America.

'So, what are you going to do about it?  Eh?  Eh?'

I have an atom bomb.  It is called The Truth.  And it will level all your lies and deceitfulness in an instant.  That's how powerful it is.

Oh, it may not happen immediately.  

But it will happen.


* I used to keep examples of all the atrocious spelling that I came across on Comments threads, until they started taking up too much space in my notebook.
     This ia about the human mind, you wretched nation wreckers.  Lay the hell off.
     A poorly trained mind is a terrible thing.  Even a crime.


from TeaPartyC.C.: ‘Putin to Western elites: Play-time is over’ - posted by Natl Dir. Dee - November 3/4 (orig. posted at - October 29, 2014)

Reply by Stan Stanfield 3 seconds ago (November 4)

Just to clarify: This speech was a year ago.

Having said that, it is still valuable, as a clear indication of Putin's thinking.  And though l have suspicions of his motives (based on deceptive measures of the old USSR), on the whole he seems to be 'a man of his word'.  And THAT said, a valid way of looking at the Russia of today is that Putin is not happy with a 'unipolar' world run by what we call the Cabal - in their lust for power and control over the whole planet - and could well be moving quietly, not against the people of the U.S., but against our erstwhile Overlords.

And that is to be appreciated; not deplored.  


As to my comment about his 'moving quietly': there is evidence that Russian troops are moving stealthily into Alaska; and, along with their quiet involvement in the Jade Helm15 exercise, they are there courtesy of Obama.  So: it is a worry, and puzzlement.  So the jury is still out on Putin's motives. 

I guess we will just have to wait and see, whose side he is actually on.

God's.  Or Mammon's.


...and one last posting for the day/night:

(email to Chuck Baldwin - November 4 - Re his News With blog: ‘Marco Rubio: Globalist Insiders’ Water Boy’ - Nov. 5; posted on Nov 4)


It is time for true conservatives/constitutionalists like you to blow the whistle on the candidacies of both Cruz and Rubio, for their not being eligible for the job, and thereby to draw attention to the illegality of BO in that position, before said Usurper pulls the lever on a (purposefully trumped-up) declaration of martial law, and it becomes too late to save the Republic.

I refer of course to the fact that none of them is a "natural born" citizen, i.e., one born on the soil of TWO (in this case, U.S.) citizen parents; as understood by the constitutional Framers when they put that more stringent eligibility requirement in their contract for that particular office, than the occupant merely needing to be a “citizen”.  For which there is ample evidence from the historical record, which I won’t go into detail in here.  (A good source of info on the subject is
As things heat up in general - in the world scene, as well as the domestic scene, with Obama making even more moves to get guns out of the hands of the citizenry - it is obvious that it is ‘all hands on deck’ time.  We constitutionalists can’t put off the day of reckoning any further.  The Constitution - i.e., the rule of law - is hanging by a thread.  We are dangerously in the territory of the rule of men in this country.  Aka arbitrary law  The hallmark of tyrants down through the ages.

We need men/women like yourself - constitutionalists with a ‘voice’ - to start calling a spade a spade on this matter.  To build a fire under both or either Cruz and/or Rubio, designed to get them to admit that they are constitutionally ineligible for the top job (or the VP slot either, for that matter) - and that therefore BO is as well.  A Usurper in the Oval Office as we speak; who is dangerously close to pulling the plug on the federal constitutional Republic of the United States of America.

With such an event as much on ‘your’ (for example) head as on the heads of TPTB behind the whole dastardly scenario.  Which has been going on long enough, now.       

It is Truth-telling time, if it ever was.

Very sincerely,


Well - one more; and then this is really it, for tonight:

from TeaPartyC.C.: ‘The GOP’s Primary Rules Might Doom Carson, Cruz And Trump’ - posted by Nat’l Dir. Dee - November 4 (orig. posted at - David Wasserman - November 4) 
(There is a hidden “structural advantage” to the party’s moderate voters)

Reply by Stan Stanfield 1 second ago (November 4)

All the more reason to winnow the field starting now, with pressure from the conservative/constitutionalist grassroots put on Cruz and Rubio to admit that they are not eligible for the top job, for not being "natural born" citizens (i.e., one born on the soil of TWO citizen parents; as the historical record shows was the definition of the term at the time) - and therefore, neither is BO; and this nation finally gets back to the rule of law - the Constitution.  Not the rule of men  Aka arbitrary law.  Which is the hallmark of tyrants down through the ages.

It's show time.  Or to say, Show and Tell.

No comments: