from rickwells.us: ‘Bill Still - What’s Behind Soros Stein Clinton Election Recount Trickery’ - Rick Wells - November 28/9
(Still thinks that they are trying to get the Electoral votes of the 3 states in ‘play’ thrown out because the recount won’t be concluded in time, and thus deprive Trump of enough votes to be below the 270-vote threshold. But a Republican-controlled Congress won’t go along with that, at the end of the day. So - what gives? My response:)
Your comment is awaiting moderation.
These NWO people are just trying to stir up a patriot backlash so that the Usurper can declare martial law, and the consequent trashing of the Constitution, to say the rule of law. The rule of men results in Chaos. Chaos = Opportunity. Order ab Chaos = their New World Order.
Clever. But no cigar.
from conservativeamerica-online.com/AmericanConservativeNews: ‘5 Potential Trump Administration Supreme Court Picks - Diane S. Skyes [sic; act. Sykes]' - November 26
I wondered if Ted Cruz may have made it on this list. Maybe Trump has another position for him.
- Conservatives need to wake up to the fact that Cruz has lied to the American people about being eligible for the office of the POTUS. He is not a 'natural born' citizen. The definition of that term, as understood by the constitutional Framers, is a person "born in the country, of parents who are citizens..." (That's what makes it 'natural,' for heaven's sake.) And that eligibility requirement for that particular office STILL STANDS, absent a constitutional amendment to the contrary.
Conservatives need to get over their infatuation with Cruz. He is a fake.
- budabobnu kibitzer3 • 3 hours ago (November 28)
Cruz was Texas's Solicitor General and successfully argued every case in favor of Texas before the US Supreme Court. You are not able to do that well is you are not steeped in Constitutional Law.
- kibitzer3 budabobnu • a few seconds ago (November 28)
He is "steeped in Constitutional Law" as taught to him by liberal law professors like Alan Dershowitz, who believe - cynically - that the Constitution is 'a living document,' rather than the contract that it is, between the States and the federal government, which can only be amended in substantive matters - like the eligibility requirements for the office of the presidency - the way allowed for IN the contract.
He may have been taught that the NBC term was 'modified' by the Naturalization Act of 1790 (which Act he has in fact claimed for his stance on the issue); but if so - to give him the benefit of the doubt - he wasn't taught that that Act of Congress was repealed by the Naturalization Act of 1795 ON THIS VERY ISSUE, of having been misleading in its use of the NBC term; and which repeal was signed off on by no less highly authoritative sources than J. Madison, as a Congressman at the time, and G. Washington, as President. And in any event, no Act of Congress, or Resolution, or whatever, can trump the Constitution. The only thing that can trump the Constitution is a constitutional amendment (or a treaty).
This assault on the Constitution on this issue has been entered into by both major political parties of our day, as a self-serving illegal act; as attested to by the fact that both of them, between 2003 and '08 alone, tried a total of 8 times [between them] to get amendments started through Congress watering down this strict requirement - proposals all of which had this issue as their common denominator - and they failed each time even to get their proposals out of committee, such was the sensitivity around this NBC issue. So what did they do? It's obvious what they did: They colluded, in an attempt to do an end-around on the Constitution on the matter; obviously figuring that between them, they had enough control over both the judicial branch of government and the MSM that they could get away with their treacherous act. But fortunately, there have been enough true constitutionalists to blow the whistle on this audacious exercise in oneupmanship, and the alternative media to help them reach the public, to alert Americans to the hijack of their country that is in progress, and has been going on ever since the Usurper who is in that awesome position of political power ascended his throne in 2008/9.
It is long past time to correct this trashing of the Constitution that has taken place. Not build on the error. Which is an error, not just in "a damn piece of paper" (as the Constitution has been referred to by another corrupt president of our time). But in the very rule of law in the country. Without which, we are being governed by the rule of men. A/k/a arbitrary law. A/k/a tyranny.
from thecommonsenseshow.com: ‘Washington Post must retract and apologize for its completely fabricated story naming indy media websites as Russian collaborators’ - Mike Adams/NaturalNews - November 27/8
(Mike Adams & Dave Hodges looking to sue the Washington Post w/ class action lawsuits/c0-litigants.)
Stan November 29, 2016 at 12:39 am
Your comment is awaiting moderation.
Unfortunately, Mike and Dave, suing them is what they want – they want to break you financially, through appeal after appeal, since that is the only way that they can bring you down. Don’t forget: the New World Order crowd have bottomless pockets. (That’s what the failure to audit the Fed has brought us.) They will spin this out as long as they can.
Just join in laughing THEM out of existence. Ridicule is a powerful weapon. (They know that one, too.)
Look to the New World Order crowd to throw everything they have at their enemies. For otherwise, they know that their days are numbered, under the backlash of the counter-revolution to the revolution that they have engaged in. And they can't have that. They have planned, and waited, too long for this Opportunity: to rule the world.
And just so, the machinations to attempt to overturn the election of Trump, that Jill Stein has entered into as well.
Desperate people make desperate decisions. Look out for the lashings of their death throes.