Thursday, 1 November 2012

For The Record

I have just read a blog on the '2012: What's the 'Real" Truth?' site that reprints a story about how the UAW and other public interest groups were today to charge Romney "with violating  the federal ethics in government law by improperly concealing his multi-million dollar windfall from the auto industry bailout".

This goes along with a previous blog at that site about Romney's suspicious activities regarding his Bain Capital investment business, having to do with links to George H. W. Bush and his involvement with drug trafficking out of Central America in the '80s.  But first things first; regarding this first blog:

2 Responses to REPOST with UPDATE: !!!!!! UAW Charges Romney With Profiteering From Auto Bailout – viralize this one!
  • e02717afe1e95c8b23aa02d1a29dc4cf.jpg
  • ohnwentsya says:
    November 2, 2012 at 12:38 am
    Reblogged this on 2012 Spirit In Action and commented:

  • I hope that the mainstream news will report important stories like this in a timely fashion, but until they do please share widely. You don’t have to like President Obama to notice his current opponent engages in criminal behaviour. I just read from a comment on another article that his vote flipping in the primary helped to eliminate the immensely popular Ron Paul from the Republican competition. Had Mr Paul been the Republican nominee I would still have voted for President Obama, but I would not have been so disturbed by the alternative. Even tho I disagree with Ron Paul on certain issues, he is NOT a criminal or a corporate stooge and I would not be terrified of a Ron Paul presidency. 

  • Unfortunately we didn’t get that choice. I know firsthand from living in Florida what it means to have a so called businessman who engages in criminal activity to further his own goals elected to lead. In Florida we almost expect such bizarre disasters-there is a whole sub-genre of fiction about the bizarrity of Florida politics! But then Florida doesn’t have to worry about foreign policy…..

    • 45017dc20ce2dd468632e1029df454c2.png
    • kibitzer3 says:
      November 2, 2012 at 1:05 am
      Just so you know: Even with our past ‘agreements to disagree’ on this blog regarding Obama, I agree with you on this one. This, in a word, stinks.

    • Let’s trust that the WHOLE truth, about BOTH candidates, comes out in the end. And in the meantime, let’s not lose contact with the higher qualities that will allow Humanity to move further up the evolutionary spiral; and out of this jungle that we are in at present. Which needs to be left behind just as soon as possible.

    • Meet you there.

    • ---

  • The earlier blog went into various accusations, including  that Romney, via his advisers - at least two of whom had links with the Project for a New American Century and the Neo-Cons' desire for and setup of "a new Pearl Harbor" in the original 9/11 travesty - was involved in the Benghazi atrocity, for the purposes of 'catching' Obama in a lack of presidential integrity regarding his role as Commander in Chief.  That charge hinges on a couple of weak links: (1) that somehow Romney's Neo-Con backers could know ahead of time that the Obama administration would not act in a timely fashion on the info, including (2) Hillary's public announcement of the facts as known at that time (which she announced at 10:08pm EST; with Romney's camp coming up with a rather suspiciously alacritous response at 10:10pm).  Another factor in this second caper is that there is conflicting info on how much the White House/State Dept. knew and when did they know it; there is whistleblower evidence that more was reported via direct intel links than has been publicly admitted to.  

  • It's all a murky mess.  I want it over and done with, as I said above, "just as soon as possible".  And LET'S MOVE ON, PEOPLE.
Tempus fugit.

There's a better 'world' to get to, than this one.  Let's call a halt to the 3D drama, close the curtain, have our critique.  And ascend.


P.S.  And a late addition to the 'flow' of this blog; this, to one at the same site titled 'Sacred Economics With Charles Eisenstein' dated 1 Nov.:

Larry Cox says:
These messages are full of “good vibes” and the truth of connectedness. But great teachers have been trying to get us to act on these truths at least since the days of Siddhārtha Gautama, and we have yet to realize their dreams.
What will make this time any different?
What my teacher has asserted is that those ancients lacked some technology (or knowledge) that they needed to deal with the problem successfully. And I think we should be discussing this more.
The planet runs on more than good intentions. And in an environment where not everybody’s intention is good, considerable confusion can result if we fail to recognize the simple fact that not everybody here is on the same side.
Of course, the old “solution” to that problem was to push back harder, to fight. “War on drugs” “War on terror” “Occupy Wall Street” and all that. It’s obviously a failed paradigm. But what is the workable paradigm that we need to replace it with?
The short answer is love. And the long answer is a workable response to the question: How do you love somebody who hates you because your aliveness frightens them too much? That answer begins in a subject that I know as Ethics.
  • kibitzer3 says:
    Good thoughts, Larry. But it’s time to take that impulse towards Ethics a little further – to its culmination, now; as we approach Transformation Time.
    Yes, “(t)he short answer is love”. And the “long answer” as “a workable response” to the question you pose is our recognition, now – with all the evidences that are now part of our culture, through videos and books and articles and studies and such – that We Are All One. That behind the mechanism of Reincarnation is the fundamental fact of our Oneness, in spirit; that As you do unto others, so do you do unto yourself – literally. For We Are [One Another; and the next step in that stream of consciousness, of unfolding awareness is to recognize that We Are] All One; just playing, and exchanging, parts, in the drama – the illusion – that we call 3D life. To learn lessons; and then – finished with the drama – moving on, up towards Unity: back to Oneness with the All That Is behind our somewhat separation into [the] autonomous units of Light that we call souls. Which all invokes the awareness of a Plan in and Purpose to the ‘project’ – evincing the life is more, far more than just in and for itself only – and therefore, gives us the only motive that we need to share goods and services with one another – and give of our best in the process. The highest motive there could ever be: to do so out of gratitude to our Creator for life with meaning. Out of, in a word: Love.
    And there’s your fundamental basis for the ‘idea’, the concept of Ethics. That we’re not just talking about material level, linear life, wherein and whereby it would simply be nice if we WERE more nice to each other. The day of mere materialistic concepts is over. And so, of course, is the day of mere religions. For, if we come back in different roles – now a prince, now a pauper; now a male, now a female; now of one race or religion or nationality, now another – what does that say to the permanence, the ultimate Truth, of any individual religion? It speaks, rather, to their ephemerality.
    It’s time to move beyond all the products of the play. And inherit our true identities; as sparks of our mutual Source.
    Hallowed be the name of The Truth.


    Yes, "the planet runs on more than good intentions," Larry et al.  And it's time that we recognized that truth.

    And almost, past time to do so.

    "(T)he workable paradigm that we need to replace it with" is staring us right in the face.  If  we but had eyes to see.

    As we are about to.  In time.

    And just in Time.



No comments: