Friday 14 July 2017

Still Time, The Phoenix


from thecommonsenseshow.com: ’State Dept Employee Being Fired For Trump Picture On Her Work Desk’ - Dave Hodges - July 14
(Sec of State employee Monika Wesolowski is being fired for displaying President Trump’s photo at her workplace.  “Yet, the people firing her are still displaying photos of [former SoS Hillary] Clinton and Obama.”  Such is how brazen things have become in this country…)


Stan July 14, 2017 at 9:48 pm
(Your comment is awaiting moderation.)

All Obama appointees to executive-branch agencies and departments – out They need to be out anyway, because Obama was an illegal president, for being ineligible for the office of the presidency in the first place; and all of the legislation that he signed into law, and all of the E.O.’s and P.D.’s that he issued, and all of the appointments that he made – including to the SCOTUS, and inferior courts – need to go with him. Into the trash bin. For it to be as though he had never been there. For he was never there, as I say, legally.

How so? Because the definition of a ‘natural born’ citizen is a person “born in the country, of parents who are citizens” thereof. (E. de Vattel, ‘The Law of Nations,’ Book One, Ch. XIX, Sect. 212; with plenty of historical evidence that the constitutional Framers so understood it to be.) And that eligibility requirement for that particular office STILL STANDS, absent a constitutional amendment to the contrary. We have, in short, been living, not under the rule of law – i.e., the Constitution – but under the rule of men, at the least ever since this scam, of Obama’s ineligibility, was perpetrated on the American people.

Time to set things to rights. And oh yes – that would get Monika’s job back, too.

--

Do I still hold out hope for this outcome, and this country??

Oh yes.

But I wouldn't if there were no God.

--

P.S. Along this same line...

     I was just rendered momentarily speechless.  I was reading an article by a male social worker, who reported:

     "After grad school, in a work setting, I was training alongside a female coworker, trying to find a client of ours an appropriate homeless shelter. He was a single father of a young child with no place to go and in need of a roof over his head. I ran into an issue finding him a place to go because a number of the shelters did not accept men.

     "When I asked my coworker why this was, she turned to me and told me that men are often “perpetrators of naughtiness” and therefore should not be allowed to access the same services as women."
     Excuse me?  He deserves what he gets, because... he's a man???
     I don't want you in my heaven, lady.  Back you go for some more seasoning.
     You wouldn't like it there, anyway.  Because there are some males there.
     And some didn't make the cut, true.
     Just like some females, that I don't care to get to know. At least, not at their current stage of development. 
     It would take too long to explain to them.  Besides, a little more life experience is the only thing that will break through that level of close-mindedness.
     And, perhaps, personal pain as well; yes.
     But such seasoning is still called for.
     No darkness allowed beyond the doorway that we are about to step through.
      At least, some of us.
     Females.  And males.
     And blacks.  And whites.  And browns.  And...and......and..........

--

I realize that all of this brings up another subject: that of the LGBTQ 'thing,' so that we're not just talking about males and females.
   
A brief word on that subject, beyond just what I have already posted at this site many times,  about the background to this brain-patterning spectrum.  This abnormal brain-patterning spectrum.

The LGBTQ special-interest crowd talk a lot about 'equality'.  A fair-enough concept.  We are all created equal.  Equal in sovereignty.  We - in this country, at least - are the sovereign.  Not the government.  It is not for the government to tell us what to do.  It is for us to tell the government what to do (under certain, constitutional limits).  And that includes to go to hell, sometimes.  If it starts getting too big for its britches.  And that brings up that other major founding quality of this particular country, that of Liberty.  

This country guarantees its citizenry, by its rule of law, the Constitution, the principle of 'essential liberty' - to be free from oppressive government in our lives.  And certainly not to stand for such oppressive, top-heavy forms of government as socialism, and such totally oppressive governments as communist regimes.  Or fascist ones either, for that matter.  And  especially not the totalitarian global New World Order, planned for us by our erstwhile masters.

The reverse image of

the Real Thing.

Heading our way.

As we speak.

So, we should not be looking to 'the government' to do things for us.  

We should be looking to do things

in alignment with our highest Selves.

In alignment, that is to say, with

our Creator Source.

Our highest Selves being in alignment with our Creator Source.  For,

We Are All

One.

And so, As you do unto others, so do you do unto yourself.

Literally.

And thar would translate, in this country, into not imposing yourself on others.

To live.  And let live.

Doing our best, to live up to our highest potential.

Which is way up there, yes.

But reachable.  Because

it's built in to The Process.



That's all I wish to say to this subject for now.

Oh.  Except just to end - and this day - on this note:

from wnd.com: 'Florist Petitions To Join Baker's Case At Supreme Court' - Bob Unruh - July 14:

"A Washington state florist is petitioning the U.S. Supreme Court for permission to join the case of Lakewood, Colorado, baker Jack Phillips, who was ordered by a state commission to undergo indoctrination, along with his staff, because he would not use his artistry to promote “gay weddings.”
"The request comes from florist Barronelle Stutzman, who was ordered by the Washington state Supreme Court to promote same-sex “weddings” with her floral artistry in violation of her faith.
"As punishment for refusing, the state court judges intoned, a court can order her to forfeit her business, savings, retirement funds and home..."
The law, sometimes, is an ass.

No comments: