Monday, 11 August 2014

On The Grapevine

(Overheard by some employees loitering outside of a meeting room in a hotel in Washington, D.C. sometime in the spring of 2008.  The employees have 'gone to ground,' in fear for their lives.  This report has been pieced together between them; who came together, to report their information, not because of their politics.  But in spite of it.  Being 'good Americans,' as they called themselves. 
     The man at the mike began with no formalities.)

"We thank you for coming, out of your busy schedules.  It will prove to be important to you that you did make the time.

"I will be brief in this explanation.  We all have work to get back to.

"Some of you will have known that between the Democrats and ourselves, we have been trying for some years to get a constitutional amendment started through Congress on the subject of the eligibility requirements for the office of the presidency.  We have sometimes included a few of those eligibility points for window dressing, but the [we think the word they were trying to remember here was 'salient'] point was to amend the Constitution away from requiring the candidates to be, quote, 'natural born' citizens.  

"Unfortunately, our people on both sides of the aisle have come up against the same argument, over and over again: that 'their constituents won't buy it'.  Listen carefully:   

"We don't care [this is a euphemism for what was actually said; we think you get the idea] what your constituents think, or say.  There is a long-time operation going on here,  and it is not going to be sidetracked by a bunch of constitutional purists.  The Constitution means what we say it means.  And what our 'experts' say it means.

"We will give you cover in a report by [what has been ascertained to be] the Congressional Research Service, wherein the definition of the term will be declared as we desire it.  All you have to do is to not rock the boat.  Understand?  

"We are all in this together.  Or we will all hang separately.  Understand?

"Now, we have worked hard to lay the groundwork for a cushy future for you, as an incumbent.  Excellent retirement pay, excellent health coverage - the lot.  You don't want to jeopardize that [here they weren't sure of the word used, but we think it was 'sinecure'] we have arranged for you, now do you.  

"I think we're understood, here.  We will give you maximum financial coverage for any primary challenge you may face.  And will join the Democrats in demonizing any 'patriots' who may dare to try to put up a challenge to you.

"You will note the absence of a few of your colleagues at this meeting.  They do not need to be told of this meeting.  I'm sure that you understand.  

"Any questions."

Someone in the audience asked about Obama.  The reply:

"He is to be 'our' opposing candidate   He is not, repeat, not to be queried about his eligibility.  Turn over any enquires from your constituents to the [CRS]. As far as you know, he is eligible; and it is 'a distracting question, anyway,' quote.   Next question."

Someone asked about the judiciary.  The reply:

"We've got that covered.  Next."     

We asked our sources, a number of times, if they heard anything in more detail about 'the judiciary'.  They could not recall anything more on that subject.

There was a bit more to the meeting, but our sources figured that they would do well not to be around when the doors opened, and quickly made themselves scarce.

And have done so, ever since.

We are sure that you understand.


With apologies to Dr. Russell L. Blaylock, who reported, in the latter half of 2000, on a meeting of medical doctors called to discuss 'unsettling' facts coming out in regards to vaccinations and their apparent role in causing Minimal Brain Damage (MBD, as they were called at the time) conditions, like autism.

His report:

The Truth Behind the Vaccine Cover-Up

I was asked to write a paper on some of the newer mechanisms of vaccine damage to the nervous system, but in the interim I came across an incredible document that should blow the lid off the cover-up being engineered by the pharmaceutical companies in conjunction with powerful governmental agencies.
It all started when a friend of mind sent me a copy of a letter from Congressman David Weldon, M.D. to the director of the CDC, Dr Julie L. Gerberding, in which he alludes to a study by a Doctor Thomas Verstraeten, then representing the CDC, on the connection between infant exposure to thimerosal-containing vaccines and neurodevelopmental injury. In this shocking letter Congressman Weldon refers to Dr. Verstraeten’s study which looked at the data from the Vaccine Safety Datalink and found a significant correlation between thimerosal exposure via vaccines and several neurodevelopmental disorders including tics, speech and language delays, and possibly to ADD.
Congressman Weldon questions the CDC director as to why, following this meeting, Dr. Verstraeten published his results, almost four years later, in the journal Pediatrics to show just the opposite, that is, that there was no correlation to any neurodevelopmental problems related to thimerosal exposure in infants. In this letter, Congressman Weldon refers to a report of the minutes of this meeting held in Georgia, which exposes some incredible statements by the “experts” making up this study group. The group’s purpose was to evaluate and discuss Dr. Verstraeten’s results and data and make recommendation that would eventually lead to possible alterations in the existing vaccine policy.
I contacted Congressman Weldon’s legislative assistant and he kindly sent me a complete copy of this report. Now, as usual in these cases, the government did not give up this report willingly, it required a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit to pry it loose. Having read the report twice and having carefully analyzed it; I can see why they did not want any outsiders to see it. It is a bombshell, as you shall see. In this analysis, I will not only describe and discuss this report, but also will frequently quote their words directly and supply the exact page number so others can see for themselves.
The official title of the meeting was the “Scientific Review of Vaccine Safety Datalink Information.” . This conference, held on June 7-8, 2000 at Simpsonwood Retreat Center, Norcross, Georgia, assembled 51 scientists and physicians of which five represented vaccine manufacturers. These included Smith Kline Beecham, Merck, Wyeth, North American Vaccine and Aventis Pasteur.
During this conference, these scientists focused on the study of the Datalink material, whose main author was Dr. Thomas Verstraesten who identified himself as working at the National Immunization Program of the CDC. It was discovered by Congressman Weldon that Dr. Verstraeten left the CDC shortly after this conference to work for GlaxoSmithKline in Belgium which manufacturers vaccines, a recurring pattern that has been given the name a “revolving door” It is also interesting to note that GlaxoSmithKline was involved in several lawsuits over complications secondary to their vaccines.
To start off the meeting, Dr. Roger Bernier, Associate Director for Science in the National Immunization Program (CDC), related some pertinent history. He stated that Congressional action in 1997 required that the FDA review mercury being used in drugs and biologics (vaccines). In meeting this order, the FDA called for information from the manufacturers of vaccines and drugs. He notes that a group of European regulators and manufacturers met on April 1999 and noted the situation but made no recommendations or changes. In other words it was all for show…"

And it goes on, and on, and on, in this sordid fashion.
Read it and weep, folks.  For you and your children.
Thanks to (Vaccination Risk Awareness Network) for this copy.

What am I saying, with all this.  I am saying that we have been led, in many areas of our civic life, by con artists; people who have had something to sell us on.
Which state of affairs is to come to a halt.
A screeching halt. 
Regardless of your 'politics'.

No comments: